Live data from Hacker News

Spotify files for its IPO

axios.com

41–50 of 218 posts

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#41
Is there anything to expect from Spotify aside from music streaming? Anything that might differentiate them in the long run?

Seems really hard to build a sustainable music-streaming business when all major competitors can simply subsidize this rather complementary part of their business (AZ, Apple, etc.).

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#42
I hope they do get funding so they can support messaging again, one of the reasons I came back to Spotify was for one of my most beloved features. Sending tracks to friends within the application, but then found out it was removed. I still subscribe to Spotify, but the "copy link" send to friend via text is so much worse than being able to just message within.

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#43

I hope they do get funding so they can support messaging again, one of the reasons I came back to Spotify was for one of my most beloved features. Sending tracks to friends within the application, but then found out it was removed. I still subscribe to Spotify, but the "copy link" send to friend via text is so much worse than being able to just message within.

Can I ask for more context on why you feel there is friction to this route? It seems most mobile applications are moving towards a route where you can share in app content via other messaging mechanisms (sms, gchat, iMessage, etc.)

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#44

Is there anything to expect from Spotify aside from music streaming? Anything that might differentiate them in the long run? Seems really hard to build a sustainable music-streaming business when all major competitors can simply subsidize this rather complementary part of their business (AZ, Apple, etc.).

I agree, this seems like a cash out for a market leader who will decline over time. (For context, I am a paid subscriber and still don't see how spotify remains leader over time due to cost.)

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#45
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>"When you buy Apple Stock it's not from Apple." How are these two comparable? When Apple IPO'd back in 1980 you were buying stock from Apple. >"...but they are probably not raising money because they either don't need it or believe they can get better funding terms." They lose hundreds of millions of dollars year over year, why would they not need it? Also why would they believe that they can get better funding now…

An IPO provides 1) a fundraising opportunity 2) a liquidity event 3) an opportunity to fulfill contractual obligations One of the conditions of their recent debt financing was that they IPO within a certain time frame. If they believe that they don't need additional funding at the moment or can get better terms then they are simply fulfilling criteria #2 and #3 with their unique IPO. I imagine Spotify can get decent…

I'm aware of what an IPO provides.

>" I imagine Spotify can get decent debt financing terms b/c they have such a steady and predictable source of revenue (though not necessarily profit)."

Again if this true, why would they raise a billion dollars in convertible debt?

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#46
I don't think this is a good long term investment.

Disclaimer: I worked for a Spotify competitor in the past, so i have a pretty solid understanding of how the business works.

I think it is a bad investment for one simple reason: Spotify purchases its main product (music) from a oligopoly. I'd estimate that 95%+ of the tracks streamed (by total playtime) are from one of the 3 major music labels: Universal, Sony or Warner. That includes sublabels that in some cases may have a seperate deal with Spotify, but at the end of the day are still part of the big 3. Imagine you are a Sony executive, walking by a news stand and the Wall Street Journal Headline is "Spotify Q2 earnings 30% up". What are you gonna do? You will squeeze them, make them pay, just enough that they survive. And Spotify has zero negotiation power here. If Sptify fails to have a deal with any 1 of these 3 labels, they become useless overnight. People will switch to Apple Music, Amazon PrimeMusic, Tidal or any other service quickly. It doesn't matter if Spotifys app is slighty better than the competitors software if they lack 1/3 of the music.

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#47

I hope they do get funding so they can support messaging again, one of the reasons I came back to Spotify was for one of my most beloved features. Sending tracks to friends within the application, but then found out it was removed. I still subscribe to Spotify, but the "copy link" send to friend via text is so much worse than being able to just message within.

Yes, I would like to see more social features that aren't tied to Facebook. I know it's not their core competency, but it's odd that the Friends feature requires FB even though they support "standard" non-FB user accounts. And a timeline-esque view of who's been listening to what at-a-glance would be neat.

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#48

Isn't the point of an IPO generally to raise funds? In this case, it's just allowing people to sell their shares to the public, right? From the company standpoint, this is almost certainly a negative: additional oversight & reporting to do, no funds raised. I guess a positive is that shareholders can cash out, but as an investor, isn't that a giant red flag? I guess as an investor, I don't see why I'd buy Spotify sha…

The major record labels are shareholders in the company.

This allows them to cash out and then go sue Spotify for all the stuff they were previously lenient with.

They will no longer have vested interest in the company and no reason to protect it.

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#49
post #46

I don't think this is a good long term investment. Disclaimer: I worked for a Spotify competitor in the past, so i have a pretty solid understanding of how the business works. I think it is a bad investment for one simple reason: Spotify purchases its main product (music) from a oligopoly. I'd estimate that 95%+ of the tracks streamed (by total playtime) are from one of the 3 major music labels: Universal, Sony or Wa…

So how do their competitors deal with this?

Re: Spotify files for its IPO

#50
post #46

I don't think this is a good long term investment. Disclaimer: I worked for a Spotify competitor in the past, so i have a pretty solid understanding of how the business works. I think it is a bad investment for one simple reason: Spotify purchases its main product (music) from a oligopoly. I'd estimate that 95%+ of the tracks streamed (by total playtime) are from one of the 3 major music labels: Universal, Sony or Wa…

>You will squeeze them, make them pay, just enough that they survive

I believe the recently announced lawsuit, coming right before this IPO, may be a fine example of exactly what you're describing.

Post reply on HN