Earlier quoted context omitted.
$
How does that work if the company was being sued? Do they have some kind of reserve to pay current employees with?
Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
211–220 of 347 posts
Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's also the reason behind ridiculous things like DRM. The idea that there is a difference between broadcasting and copying, and that computers can emulate that difference is a pipe dream; nonetheless shared by most music labels.
It doesn't seem outlandish to claim there's a distinction between a broadcast, where you might hear a song at a particular time of day, and having an on-demand copy of a song at any time. The former scenario could see you, for instance, buying a CD because you liked a song you heard on the radio; that is probably not as likely with Spotify.
Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#213What a headache of an industry to get into. Seeing the direction that Pandora, Soundcloud, and others have gone, I wouldn't touch this vertical with 10-ft pole and a billion in capital.
Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#214What a headache of an industry to get into. Seeing the direction that Pandora, Soundcloud, and others have gone, I wouldn't touch this vertical with 10-ft pole and a billion in capital.
Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
>"Doesn't having an offline mode run counter to this claim? That's clearly reproducing it." I agree with this. Even if it only lives an encrypted cache you are effectively doing a bit by bit reproduction when you offline sync. They do expire once the user hadn't logged in for some amount of time, I believe it's something like after 30 days of not logging in or refreshing a token. Before streaming when someone bought…
That's an implementation detail - which is not what copyright is about. Even radio is on the receiving end reproduced bit by bit, copied multiple times and stored in some kind of memory, which could be analog or digital.
That is what copyright is about, the right to copy. In this case a mechanical license is at issue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_license
See the two types of copyright in mechanical license, the composition and the recording.
This is exactly what is being alleged by Wixen. See the lawsuit @ https://www.scribd.com/document/368281292/Wixen-Music-Publis...
Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#216Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does that work if the company was being sued? Do they have some kind of reserve to pay current employees with?
Being tied up in a lawsuit does not grind a company to a halt. Most of the Fortune 500 is probably getting sued right now for some reason or another. Also, when a company loses a lawsuit, the court doesn’t automatically debit the damages from the company. Winning a case and collecting damages are 2 very different things.
Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s kind of a gray area, the whole performing/mechanical rights system was obviously invented before streaming. Radio stations pay for performing rights, so the question arises whether streaming is more like radio broadcast or manufacturing and distributing physical copies (e.g. CDs)? Without further legislation, ultimately only the courts can decide that. My guess is that ultimately streaming rights will end up as…
On a logical level it should be treated the same as broadcast radio, however it gets hazy because you can store playlists and play tracks on demand so its really not clear cut. With radio you can hear the song if it happens to be playing but there is no on demand, no playlists.
Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#219What a headache of an industry to get into. Seeing the direction that Pandora, Soundcloud, and others have gone, I wouldn't touch this vertical with 10-ft pole and a billion in capital.
Re: Spotify hit with $1.6B copyright lawsuit
#220Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many Disney stories (including Snow White) are copied from earlier works by authors unaffiliated with Disney.
Copied? Snow White was a groundbreaking feat of animation brilliance, a result of tireless effort, craftsmanship and detail that experts widely agree rivals any animation project produced to date. It was literally the first feature-length color animated film with sync audio ever produced, and you’re cutting it down for it’s screenplay being inspired by a fairy tale? This is no weakness. This is consistent with filmma…
Compare it to female counterparts in, say, Hayao Miyazaki cartoons where women are proactive and actually have character development.