Live data from Hacker News

So Close

hackernoon.com

221–230 of 274 posts

Re: So Close

#221
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you love someone you should be willing to give anything up. Anything. Morals, country, God, anything -- let alone, property. If not, that's ok but it's not "love" in my book.

Love is sacrifice. Be with someone that brings you joy when those sacrifices are necessary.

Yes, love is sacrifice, that's my point.

Re: So Close

#222
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> May I ask if you have kids? Yes you may. I have 3 (8-9-12). I don't "trust" them to not eat candy that I said they shouldn't eat, but I do trust them not to kill me in my sleep -- which is what trust is about (IMHO). In fact I think I trust them more than I love them, and I love them a lot. But sometimes I'm upset with them. Being upset or angry doesn't affect trust. Trust is a kind of binary quality that is either…

So I guess you don't believe in "unconditional love"? I just can't imagine not loving my kids even if I knew I could not trust them. Another example would be family with mental illness to such a degree you may actually fear they will kill you in your sleep, but hopefully they would be placed in a safer environment and still have their families love and support.

Drug and alcohol.dependency are the things you need to worry about, not mental illness.

http://research.bmh.manchester.ac.uk/cmhs/research/centrefor...

Page 5:

> xx. In all four UK countries, most patients convicted of homicide also have a history of alcohol or drug misuse, between 88% in England and 100% in N Ireland. In other words it is unusual for mental health patients to commit homicide unless there is a coexisting problem of substance misuse.

Re: So Close

#223

These responses contain a lot of condemnation (based mainly on price) of a product that these people have never used. Building a premium first product to fund further development is a common approach (think Tesla), as is creating a premium niche in an otherwise commoditized market (Apple). While it does sound like costs/scope got out of control, please remember that price is oftentimes determined fairly far down the…

Yes, but ... surely questions should have been asked at the point where they raised $45 million? It's a lock. Has there been any ordinary door lock in history that cost even a fraction of that to develop? I don't think this can just be blown off by saying "hardware is hard". People have been making locks for millenia. It is objectively not hard. Hotels and offices routinely have cryptographic unlock keycard systems that are managed remotely and they do not cost $700. There just seems to be a disconnect from the rest of the world in this business plan.

Re: So Close

#224

It's good this happened, else we'd have another Juicero on our hands. Ridiculous price, beautifully over engineered product, a slight update to a centuries old problem, but at least they didn't get the opportunity to burn up as much investor money as Juicero.

That said, most people use locks multiple times a day (and keep keys with us at all times), whereas we rarely drink juice. Juicero was a high cost solution for a relatively uncommon use case. This appears to be a high cost solution for a common one. It's possible that it was overpriced, but the idea of paying $600+ for a phone would have seemed nuts years ago as well. It's easy to say something has a ridiculous price…

Nobody pays $600 for a phone. They pay $600 for a portable computer with a touch screen and multiple types of radio attached.

Re: So Close

#225

I worked on Otto's server side software as a contractor for five months. The company had some servers written in C and exchanging messages using a custom binary protocol, designed for millions of transactions per second, when they needed only 2-3tps, readability, and the ability to make fast changes. We rewrote those servers in Go, found and fixed consistency errors in them, and actually got to the point where you co…

I swear I've seen your site before. I'd consider that good but hopefully it wasn't due to a similar scenario in the past. Anyway, best of luck!

Re: So Close

#226

I worked on Otto's server side software as a contractor for five months. The company had some servers written in C and exchanging messages using a custom binary protocol, designed for millions of transactions per second, when they needed only 2-3tps, readability, and the ability to make fast changes. We rewrote those servers in Go, found and fixed consistency errors in them, and actually got to the point where you co…

I swear I've seen your site before. I'd consider that good but hopefully it wasn't due to a similar scenario in the past. Anyway, best of luck!

Fortunately (depending on your perspective) this is the first and only time a company has not made good on their invoices.

I have great relations with every company that has paid me! And every company I’ve worked with has been satisfied with what I’ve built for them

Re: So Close

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This question makes it hard to believe you’re of adult age. Just about any adult should be able to imagine reasonable circumstances in which they could make “six figures” and still struggle to (e.g.) make rent.

This is almost the definition of bad adulting. If you make six figures, there's so many ways to live in the US within your means. Of course you can create difficult circumstances for yourself by paying 4k in rent as the sole provider, but this is irresponsible.

I don't think you appreciate just how crazy Silicon Valley, and by extension, most of the rest of California, is. You don't really get an option to not participate in the craziness if you live there. Your only real choice if you want financial sanity is to not live there. Naturally, it's difficult to work in a SF-SV-based startup if you don't live there.

So we're not talking about responsibility anymore, you're moralizing on people's life choices. There's no way to responsibly live in SV without being already rich.

Re: So Close

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's likely that several of these employees are legitimately broke (for reasons beyond their control, not because they're bad at adulting), but they conceal it. Signs of weakness harm your negotiating position.

Honest question: What normal circumstances would lead to anyone making six figures being broke that doesn't involve bad adulting?

I've been one of those people. Sending money home to parents who were barely holding on to their home, and with health conditions that insurance terminated coverage for, combined with rent getting jacked up, a $4000 emergency room bill I couldn't even pay, and my own health issues creating a vicious cycle of lower productivity, more stress, worse health.

This isn't even an uncommon occurrence. I had coworkers (at one of the big 5) who were making pretty decent money who were still in the hole for similar reasons.

Have some compassion man, jeez.

Re: So Close

#229
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So I guess you don't believe in "unconditional love"? I just can't imagine not loving my kids even if I knew I could not trust them. Another example would be family with mental illness to such a degree you may actually fear they will kill you in your sleep, but hopefully they would be placed in a safer environment and still have their families love and support.

I do believe in unconditional love -- in fact it's my whole point. How can you not trust your kids? The case of mental imparemeent is interesting and I had not considered it. It would be possible to argue that the person isn't there anymore if they're crazy, and there needs to be someone to exercise love against. I'm not sure. Also, maybe persons with mental illnesses could be trusted more in our society.

> I do believe in unconditional love -- in fact it's my whole point.

OK, so if love is unconditional, then what about situations where you love them but they hate you? If it's unconditional love, then you love them regardless of their feelings towards you.

What do you do if your kid is an actual psychopath and doesn't love you. Do you still love them unconditionally? Would you trust them with the keys to the gun safe?

What do you do if you have an adult child that has made some really bad life choices and is spiraling out of control addicted to hard drugs? Do you still love them (unconditional, right)? Do you trust them with the keys to your alcohol cabinet? The details to your bank account?

Love != trust.

There are some situations where if you truly love someone you do not extend them trust (because they will abuse it regardless of your love for them).

Re: So Close

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla took in $250 million of full-price preorders for their next-gen Roadster, which is years away from production. The comment you replied to didn’t imply that Tesla does this with every car.

The next-gen Roadster has 2 preorder levels, one that's full price for an early car, and another for 1/5 the amount that's farther back in the queue. Tesla has done the same system with every car they've launched. My purpose was to explain what Tesla actually does. I was not implying that the previous poster was wrong.

I’m not aware of any previous model where Tesla has offered a full price preorder. Certainly they haven’t done so for the X, 3, or semi.

I don’t understand how “This is not what Tesla has ever done” could mean anything other than that they were wrong.

Post reply on HN