Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you had a bad device. I am using a one plus device for last 2 years with none of your issues. I have friends relatives using even older devices. Not all devices are same.
My friend Nexus 5 had the same shitty performance in the same timeframe and then I realised that he never used an iphone and for him that sluggish performance was normal and he never noticed that he had a problem. Pretty much every other Nexus 5 that I have seen was the same and my friend Nexus 6n or whatever is called was even slower when it was newer.
A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
701–710 of 878 posts
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#702Earlier quoted context omitted.
most popular android phones have large development communities[0] behind them. Removing the default [Android] OS that's ridden with spyware, including always-on Google Services, is critical to getting control over your phone. Flashing something like LineageOS (formerly CyanogenMod) is the best way to get started with a lean android os [0]- forum.xda-developers.com
How much can I trust those ROM builders, though? If I use anything other than the official LineageOS builds (e.g. if there are none for my device, or only nightly ones) I can't even be sure that the binaries that people upload match the source code they publish, right? They might even not publish the source, and if they do, what are the chances that anyone has audited it?
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#703As usual, the only thing that corporations listen to... is the threat of the dollar. They didn't give two craps about their policy until this week.
Dear downvoter: I dare you to provide logic or a source that rebukes my point.
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#704Earlier quoted context omitted.
The outrage doesn't seem overblown to me. For years I knew that my iphones were becoming obsolete not entirely from the passage of time but instead from upgrading the OS. Apple insisted they were not slowing down devices. Now they claim that they started this in iOS 10.2, without notification. My experience has been that upgrading the OS results in degraded performance 100% of the time. Whether intentional or not App…
Does this include running the new OS after a factory reset? I find that even on Android, you drop some performance after a full system upgrade and it doesn't come back until a full reset is performed with the new OS. It's stupid that this is required, but that can be explained as a technical problem rather than planned obsolescence. On top of that, there's the variable of increased system resources to consider, which…
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#705It will be interesting to see how other companies which base their products on Lithium ion batteries deal with similar degradation. For example, How will Tesla handle this scenario? Will they slow down the car when the battery performance is not adequate? Interesting to see how companies make tradeoffs.
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#706Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your issue isn't this "scandal" though. This is about preventing sporadic shutdowns by throttling, so if your phone was shutting down it was an undiagnosed bad battery, which is a legit complaint.
Yes it is. The “fix” was introduced to avoid these crashes by throttling instead of browning out. It’s in the article.
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#707Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s really simple: 1. It’s impossible for Apple to make a device that perfectly pleases everyone 2. Not all feature sets are possible 3. Apple constantly makes decisions about which trade-offs to make Sometimes you’re just not the target market for a device a company makes. That’s ok, and it isn’t necessarily the fault of the company that such is the case, they just opted for a different feature set than the one you…
It's kindof interesting that everything in your comment is true, and yet it's not clear that most of it is relevant in this case. No one has introduced the standard of perfect pleasure here. The standard that has been introduced is one of both ability and ease in regards to what I'd think anyone would agree is a fundamental feature for a personal mobile device: getting audio to route from that device to common output…
Add to the fact that they obsess over making their devices beautifully engineered by making them slimmer and lighter to increase portability. The more portable your hardware is, the more you are likely to use it and recommend it to others. Portability helps Apple sell more devices. This has been Apple's focus since Job's return.
A few examples:
1. They were one of the first laptop makers to do away with integrated CD/DVD drives because they saw that fewer and fewer people were using them. The tradeoff here is obvious: they figured that Internet speeds would improve to the point that it would eventually replace 4.7GB DVDs as the standard means of distributing software for most of their customers (read: people with high disposable income). This has happened.
2. Apple was the first to ship a mainstream device (iMac) that supported the USB standard (which they didn't invent). USB adoption helped obsolete older tech: serial, parallel and PS/2 ports.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#History
3. The iPhone obsoleted keyboard-centric phone designs from BlackBerry, Nokia, Samsung etc which were widespread prior to 2007 to a more natural touch-centric interface. Apple had previously launched the failed Newton device but this time they made several complementary investments in the user experience that made them feel confident that touch interfaces had matured enough to become mainstream. Remember that the first iPhone didn't even have copy&paste, regardless, their bet against old tech paid off :).
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#708Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's why people largely vote on lines of ideology and hot-button issues; they're (ostensibly) voting on character and judgement, leaving the minutiae to Congress and bureaucrats to figure out. Otherwise, what's the point of Congress if we aren't going to leave it to them to figure things out?
The point is there should not be a far-away Congress with such large powers. It worked when there were 13 states clustered along one coast. Now it's its own empire-building entity with little practical oversight.
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#709Lots of people saying that Apple only had two options - make old handsets slower, or have them randomly shutdown. Might be a reflection of the culture those commenters are from, but it's disingenuous to assert. Other options existed -- notably to advise the user, as part of the update, via mail-out, etc, that this choice had been made from them, and (optionally) what they could do about it.
I know car analogies are overused but … I would be classed as literally insane if I replaced my car because the battery had become degraded. When this happens you get a mechanic to replace the battery. (Or, if the owner is very competent they replace it themselves.) If we do it for cars, why not for phones?
I would absolutely love if this issue got regulated across the board the same way the charging cable connection (everything has to be usb-micro or usb-C) got regulated. Though somehow Apple didn't comply and didn't get penalised.
Re: A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
#710I don't see the difference between the Volkswagen scandal and this. Both companies used software to their own benefit to harm other parties.
Were you actually "harmed?" Let's not compare increasing pollution to you not being able to play Angry Birds with the same level of gusto.