Alright, back to studying.
Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#12Funny how utterly natural and subconsious this stuff becomes after a while. I almost felt like commenting something snyde about how superfluous it is to make it this explicit, but then I realized that it was only a few years ago that it made my consious brain totally overwhelmed.
Yeah at first I was thinking "is this not the only way of understanding written mathematics?!!" Then I realized that when I was a freshman undergrad, I understood much less than half of the terminology that is considered basic mathematics. The formalisms behind WOLOG and \forall \epsilon >0 \exists \delta > 0 s.t. yadda yadda were completely lost on me. A lot of mathematics is simply familiarity, and that's easy to f…
There's nothing special about mathematics in this regard.
Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#13Beyond notation and ordering, I have had the best results reading and comprehending complex concepts, including mathematics, by taking the following suggestion to the extreme: > Read with pencil and paper in hand, making up little examples for yourself as you go on. I like to find a difficult question that I can answer with an understanding of the material. This acts as a litmus test of my understanding and a forcing…
I do the exact opposite - I don't write anything down and try to visualize what I'm reading entirely. I don't start writing anything down when doing exercises until I have the entire solution in mind (unless it's something computational). It's hard to get used to doing at first, but, after a couple years, my abstract reasoning skills developed significantly past most or all of my peers.
Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#14Beyond notation and ordering, I have had the best results reading and comprehending complex concepts, including mathematics, by taking the following suggestion to the extreme: > Read with pencil and paper in hand, making up little examples for yourself as you go on. I like to find a difficult question that I can answer with an understanding of the material. This acts as a litmus test of my understanding and a forcing…
I do the exact opposite - I don't write anything down and try to visualize what I'm reading entirely. I don't start writing anything down when doing exercises until I have the entire solution in mind (unless it's something computational). It's hard to get used to doing at first, but, after a couple years, my abstract reasoning skills developed significantly past most or all of my peers.
Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#15Right now I'm studying for my math final for computer engineering. This really does speak to me as I often don't understand certain parts of the chapter and just skip ahead to the exercises and then I try to reflect back to the theory. Thank god that I don't have to learn a single proof though. Alright, back to studying.
Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#16Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#17From which book is this?
Looks to be a multivariate calculus text by the Hubbards: http://matrixeditions.com/5thUnifiedApproach.html
Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#18Right now I'm studying for my math final for computer engineering. This really does speak to me as I often don't understand certain parts of the chapter and just skip ahead to the exercises and then I try to reflect back to the theory. Thank god that I don't have to learn a single proof though. Alright, back to studying.
I'm studying computer science myself and very much enjoy writing proofs. Is there any particular reason that you don't?
Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looks to be a multivariate calculus text by the Hubbards: http://matrixeditions.com/5thUnifiedApproach.html
That's correct (a later edition than the pdf given the date). It is a beautiful book that blends the practical and abstract together to really give a solid foundation in both linear algebra and multivariable calculus topics. If someone asked me for exactly one book to read after learning single variable calculus, this is the book I would recommend. It is long, but extremely satisfying. It covers in detail many topics…
Re: Reading Mathematics (2002) [pdf]
#20Right now I'm studying for my math final for computer engineering. This really does speak to me as I often don't understand certain parts of the chapter and just skip ahead to the exercises and then I try to reflect back to the theory. Thank god that I don't have to learn a single proof though. Alright, back to studying.