Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, that is an astute observation and the only way you can gauge accuracy is to confirm ground truth some other way. Try probing the system so that it conforms to your model and revise it when new evidence is apparent.
>confirm ground truth I'm not a philosopher, but I do enjoy reading and learning about post modernism. Isn't a large point of this book that you actually can't confirm a "ground truth"?
Ask HN: Any recommended books on developing mental models?
61–67 of 67 posts
Re: Ask HN: Any recommended books on developing mental models?
#62I've set it up on a daily cron and now I receive every day a cognitive bias on my e-mail and read it on breakfast.
So far some biases really stuck with me and I notice myself referring to them every time I'm thinking about something.
With the results I have only for a couple of weeks I'm definitely planning to use it all my life.
Here is the code: https://github.com/zuzuleinen/bibi
Re: Ask HN: Any recommended books on developing mental models?
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, I figured you had an axe to grind.
Please don't be rude in comments here, even when someone else had an axe to grind.
Re: Ask HN: Any recommended books on developing mental models?
#64Re: Ask HN: Any recommended books on developing mental models?
#65[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the...
Re: Ask HN: Any recommended books on developing mental models?
#66Re: Ask HN: Any recommended books on developing mental models?
#67It occurred to me that consciousness may also be a hierarchy of holons. A whole can only be known from a "holistic" perspective. Any attempt to reduce it to parts to understand the whole destroys the character of the whole. This may help explain why reductionist science has had little success in explaining consciousness.