What an excellent occasion to try the homoglyph hoax attack on friends and enemies! (See http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1571984 .) http://www.google.com/search?q=οraclе Your search - οraclе - did not match any documents.
Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
61–70 of 345 posts
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#62Google should switch to C# and Mono. Besides giving them a better language and VM, it would cause the most amusing set of rants from the anti-Mono crowd. Win/win.
By better language, do you mean better than Java? The JVM supports many other great languages like Ruby, Clojure and Scala. I'd love to see Google provide GWT support for Scala, but that's another issue :)
I think Oracle is being beyond stupid here. If anyone has the power to come up with a language and toolchain to make Java utterly irrelevant, its Google.
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#63What an excellent occasion to try the homoglyph hoax attack on friends and enemies! (See http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1571984 .) http://www.google.com/search?q=οraclе Your search - οraclе - did not match any documents.
Incidentally, these homoglyph attacks are pretty hard to catch. Even Vim (which normally chokes on 8+ bit characters in my setup) didn't seem to show anything different until I checked the hex codes.
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#64I'm sorry, but I just don't understand this decision. Is Oracle in need of cash or something? Why did they become patent trolls? I mean, they're not even in the smart phone business, and it's not like Google is going to put a DBMS into Android. How are they being threatened in any way by Google?
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#65What an excellent occasion to try the homoglyph hoax attack on friends and enemies! (See http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1571984 .) http://www.google.com/search?q=οraclе Your search - οraclе - did not match any documents.
now it returns this comment on hacker news which explains that its a hoax, heh
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#66I'm sure there would be speed issues, but Google is really supportive of Python right? Wink wink, nudge nudge. (I've heard about the Android Scripting Environment, but it sounds like that is not as fully supported as might be ideal).
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#67The biggest issue I see with Oracle's lawsuit is not with Android itself, but the future of Java as an open platform. The claims are pretty serious, and Oracle is going straight for the jugular. It'll be interesting to see how it shakes out, but I've got to hope that Google will come out of this in good shape for the sake of Java. It's unfortunate that Oracle is interpreting Google's implementation of Dalvik and a Ja…
Oracle may claim that Google infringes on all those patents, but they'll never sue. Patents are just a nuclear deterrent. Edit: Wow, -7 and dropping. I guess I should have included a sarcasm symbol. Spoiler: My point was that patents do get used, and this argument about them just being for defense is nonsense.
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#68The headline should read "Oracle sues Google over literally the only thing keeping Java relevant".
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm struggling to understand this as well - I would have thought OSS licensing and software patents would be incompatible.
Sadly they are not. This is why the W3C has a patent policy [1] to prevent contributed software and specifications from being covered by patents. [1]: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ If this still does not make any sense, realize that patents and copyrights, while both forms of IP, are completely different, legally. Also recall how open source GIF implementations were still covered by the Unisys…
Re: Oracle sues Google over use of Java in Android
#70What an excellent occasion to try the homoglyph hoax attack on friends and enemies! (See http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1571984 .) http://www.google.com/search?q=οraclе Your search - οraclе - did not match any documents.