Live data from Hacker News

Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

bbc.co.uk

31–40 of 242 posts

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#31
post #2

I wonder if Altman bought this up when he was in China.

Sam Altman loves China; he'll ignore everything bad about it except the (certain) libertarian aspects (which doesn't conflict with the government)

EDIT: whoever modded me down, take a look at http://blog.samaltman.com/china or https://techcrunch.com/video/sam-altman-of-yc-china-remains-...

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#32
This bit confused me:

> China bans all activists' commemorations and highly regulates online discussion of the incident, including censoring criticism. But it is marked annually by activists elsewhere in the world, particularly in Hong Kong and Taiwan. [Emphasis added.]

Hong Kong is part of China, albeit as a special administrative region. So does the ban not apply in HK? Or does it apply in theory, but in practice is not enforced? Or are HK-based activists just more willing to flout the ban?

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#33
post #32

This bit confused me: > China bans all activists' commemorations and highly regulates online discussion of the incident, including censoring criticism. But it is marked annually by activists elsewhere in the world, particularly in Hong Kong and Taiwan. [Emphasis added.] Hong Kong is part of China, albeit as a special administrative region. So does the ban not apply in HK? Or does it apply in theory, but in practice i…

The last one. There's no stopping these activites in Hong Kong. (for the moment)

It is becoming very clear however, that a serious crackdown from Beijing is coming. Not on this particular incident, but in general on the political freedom in Hong Kong. It is becoming undeniable China demanded Hong Kong back in order to destroy it.

But when it will arrive. Good question.

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#34
post #20
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reading that made me feel physically sick, and then the line afterwards about the girls begging for their lives who were bayonetted. Just awful. I have, and probably always will, find Chinese culture somewhat fascinating but I have no love for their political regime.

Yup in contrast the American regime has about 1000x [1] the death toll but at least those people weren't bulldozed and it didn't make you and me feel too bad. Calling the other side evil is easy. Spotting hypocrisy is easy. Doing something about hyprocisy is much harder. It involves admitting to ourselves that all of us are capable of doing dumb shit. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes

A couple things to unpack here:

Firstly, I'm not sure we're reading the same article, but by my summary count, the total death toll for all combined US war crimes detailed in that article isn't much more than 10,000.

Next, the veracity of some of those claims is questionable at best.

Finally, it should be noted that the Tiananmen Square protests, were, in fact, protests. This was not an action against civilians during war time, this was an action taken by a government against it's own citizens who were protesting.

Is killing unarmed soldiers or civilians in war time justified? Generally no. But it's a different type of crime when you're in the middle of a war zone. Humans don't deal well with the insane nature of war, and so they do horrible things. That's not an excuse, mind you. But I think collateral damage in a war and civilian casualties in a war zone are very different scenarios than Tiananmen Square.

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#35
Lest we forget, this is still the same government that mowed down 10,000 innocent lives, that still runs China today. They've gotten better at hiding behind marketing, propaganda, and strong arming other countries, but they're still ruled by a small, powerful group of elders that control every aspects of Chinese people's lives.

It's sad that we keep feeding this dangerous psychopath which threatens democracy and freedom worldwide. This psychopath will eventually cause harm to a few countries (Taiwan, South Korea) when said and done, maybe enable North Korea to strike a few nuclear missiles into Los Angeles or Tokyo, who knows.

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#36
post #6

What did they do with all the bodies? "Students linked arms but were mown down including soldiers. APCs then ran over bodies time and time again to make 'pie' and remains collected by bulldozer. Remains incinerated and then hosed down drains.“

Reading that made me feel physically sick, and then the line afterwards about the girls begging for their lives who were bayonetted. Just awful. I have, and probably always will, find Chinese culture somewhat fascinating but I have no love for their political regime.

[deleted]

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#37
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup in contrast the American regime has about 1000x [1] the death toll but at least those people weren't bulldozed and it didn't make you and me feel too bad. Calling the other side evil is easy. Spotting hypocrisy is easy. Doing something about hyprocisy is much harder. It involves admitting to ourselves that all of us are capable of doing dumb shit. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes

Yes, comparing the entire history of American war crimes against one domestic incident in China will give you a much bigger American death toll number. A fairer comparison would include Mao's killing of 45 million of his citizens.

Still not fair comparison, as these were also "their own". Not saying "us vs. them" is something to aspire to, but I think we can all agree that a military's responsibility to their own populace is a bit larger than their responsibility to an enemy populace.

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#38
post #32

This bit confused me: > China bans all activists' commemorations and highly regulates online discussion of the incident, including censoring criticism. But it is marked annually by activists elsewhere in the world, particularly in Hong Kong and Taiwan. [Emphasis added.] Hong Kong is part of China, albeit as a special administrative region. So does the ban not apply in HK? Or does it apply in theory, but in practice i…

[deleted]

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, comparing the entire history of American war crimes against one domestic incident in China will give you a much bigger American death toll number. A fairer comparison would include Mao's killing of 45 million of his citizens.

Still not fair comparison, as these were also "their own". Not saying "us vs. them" is something to aspire to, but I think we can all agree that a military's responsibility to their own populace is a bit larger than their responsibility to an enemy populace.

Oh, for sure.

If the poster's gonna compare apples to oranges, though, they should at least compare the full apple instead of a tiny sliver of it.

Re: Tiananmen Square 1989 death toll was at least 10,000 according to UK documents

#40
post #32

This bit confused me: > China bans all activists' commemorations and highly regulates online discussion of the incident, including censoring criticism. But it is marked annually by activists elsewhere in the world, particularly in Hong Kong and Taiwan. [Emphasis added.] Hong Kong is part of China, albeit as a special administrative region. So does the ban not apply in HK? Or does it apply in theory, but in practice i…

The last one. There's no stopping these activites in Hong Kong. (for the moment) It is becoming very clear however, that a serious crackdown from Beijing is coming. Not on this particular incident, but in general on the political freedom in Hong Kong. It is becoming undeniable China demanded Hong Kong back in order to destroy it. But when it will arrive. Good question.

China's economic growth in the last couple of decades has in a way been terrible for the long-term future of Hong Kong. When Hong Kong was transferred from the British to the Chinese, there was some question about whether you could have the prosperity of a market economy without the political freedom of a democracy. I'd imagine China was hesitant to mess too much with Hong Kong in fear of killing its economy. But it turns out that you can have markets without democracy; you need the rule of law but it doesn't matter if people get to vote on the government that makes the laws. That eliminates the long-term incentive to maintain Hong Kong as a separate system.
Post reply on HN