Live data from Hacker News

Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

urbo.com

11–20 of 85 posts

Re: Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

#11
post #5
post #4

It might be different now, but I'm pretty sure back in the Bob Barker era contestant selection wasn't random. The entire audience had to introduce themselves to the producer one by one and answer his questions about where they were from, what they did, and if they were there with anyone. The people selected were fairly attractive and charismatic. The selection also leaned toward people who came with larger groups. I…

Given your comment, I wonder if there's an interesting list of people who have been on the Price is Right. For example, one person I can think of is Aaron Paul (Jesse Pinkman from Breaking Bad) who said: "It looks like I'm on some serious crack. I downed about six cans of red bull because I knew they wanted people with energy. It worked, but I could not sit still. It was not healthy."

This is definitely worth looking up on Youtube.

Re: Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

#12
post #9

>buzzing in when he didn't know the answers to prevent other contestants from winning money Can anybody explain this part of Arthur Chu’s Jeopardy strategy? Don’t they still get the chance to answer? Or is his strategy that he’ll figure it out within the allotted time? Also was anyone else unimpressed by the main character in the articles uncanny ability to predict weather in Las Vegas? Let me guess, it will be hot.…

> Can anybody explain this part of Arthur Chu’s Jeopardy strategy? Don’t they still get the chance to answer? Or is his strategy that he’ll figure it out within the allotted time?

As I recall, he went hunting for Daily Doubles to take them off the board and away from other players who might be able to answer them. Only the finder gets to pose a question for those.

Re: Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

#13
post #4

It might be different now, but I'm pretty sure back in the Bob Barker era contestant selection wasn't random. The entire audience had to introduce themselves to the producer one by one and answer his questions about where they were from, what they did, and if they were there with anyone. The people selected were fairly attractive and charismatic. The selection also leaned toward people who came with larger groups. I…

The contestant selection for the Price is Right television show isn't random. You're spot on, a producer selects the contestants based on a quick interview with each audience member before the show. Even if the selection process has changed recently this story is from 2008. The article is wrong. And this website appears to be spun click traffic farming site, way to go Hacker News.

Re: Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

#14
post #12
post #9

>buzzing in when he didn't know the answers to prevent other contestants from winning money Can anybody explain this part of Arthur Chu’s Jeopardy strategy? Don’t they still get the chance to answer? Or is his strategy that he’ll figure it out within the allotted time? Also was anyone else unimpressed by the main character in the articles uncanny ability to predict weather in Las Vegas? Let me guess, it will be hot.…

> Can anybody explain this part of Arthur Chu’s Jeopardy strategy? Don’t they still get the chance to answer? Or is his strategy that he’ll figure it out within the allotted time? As I recall, he went hunting for Daily Doubles to take them off the board and away from other players who might be able to answer them. Only the finder gets to pose a question for those.

But that has nothing to do with:

>buzzing in when he didn't know the answers to prevent other contestants from winning money

Re: Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

#15
post #3

Short version: TPIR used to recycle prices/products, so with studying it is easy to guess prices of products on the show. Many contestants and avid fans know this, and one of them got extra lucky in the showcase showdown by guessing the exact price, at about 1/1000 odds (after accounting for common sense and attentiveness) , which is likely to happen eventually for a daily show like TPIR. (Or possibly he was cheating…

They were both (perhaps) being signaled by an audience member.

This article is much more thorough:

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a7922/price-is-right-pe...

Re: Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

#17
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Can anybody explain this part of Arthur Chu’s Jeopardy strategy? Don’t they still get the chance to answer? Or is his strategy that he’ll figure it out within the allotted time? As I recall, he went hunting for Daily Doubles to take them off the board and away from other players who might be able to answer them. Only the finder gets to pose a question for those.

But that has nothing to do with: >buzzing in when he didn't know the answers to prevent other contestants from winning money

Yeah, I think it's just a misunderstanding/probably a mis-edit.

Re: Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

#19
post #16

I've no idea what's going on on this page, but my iPhone got really hot and Firefox (on my desktop) warned me that the page was running slow. The profiler on Chrome hung when trying to profile the page and I had to kill the tab in task manager.

Privacy Badger on my Chrome Windows shows 22 trackers and uBlock Origin blocked 49 requests. That's a lot of bloat that is probably eating the CPU.

Re: Victory on “The Price Is Right” Made Them Change Their System

#20
post #16

I've no idea what's going on on this page, but my iPhone got really hot and Firefox (on my desktop) warned me that the page was running slow. The profiler on Chrome hung when trying to profile the page and I had to kill the tab in task manager.

Privacy Badger on my Chrome Windows shows 22 trackers and uBlock Origin blocked 49 requests. That's a lot of bloat that is probably eating the CPU.

I’m not convinced it’s the volume alone. I’m using ad blockers on all of my devices, and I’ve seen mainstream media sites with more than that. It could be an errant script that’s not being caught by an ad blocker and has wound up in an infinite loop.
Post reply on HN