Live data from Hacker News

Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

exstreamist.com

121–130 of 462 posts

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#121
post #23

I was thinking about this the other day, and I was wondering whether the fact that my kids are not exposed at all to commercials might make them more susceptible to advertising when they grow up.

Alternatively it might make them less tolerant and therefore less susceptible. I'm wondering the same about my kids, as we cut the cord several years ago.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#122
post #94
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you step back a bit from that game you realize it's tickling the same mental circuits you use in programming. If I had kids I'd definitely try to get them interested. SpaceChem even more so.

This unfortunately makes Zachtronics games a non-starter for me. Software development and Zachtronics games is a fast track to burnout. Their last two involve literal programming.

I never got that feeling about Factorio (though I don't do EE), but I did with SpaceChem

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#123

Time to double down on product placement.

Product placement is difficult in the shows I watch most: The Walking Dead, Fear the Walking Dead, Vikings. Luxury items don't and didn't exist in the aforementioned shows. I watch TV sitting with a laptop. I mute during the commercials and look at whatever for 2-3 minutes and return to watching. Done this for decades. I will likely go straight Internet connection in 2018 once I figure out how to get BBC and BBC Amer…

The Walking Dead had a longtime product placement deal with Hyundai. Although it was much ridiculed, much of the point of product placement is to cause positive associations to be made between the product and the setting.

Many people may not have thought of a Hyundai as a rough-and-tumble kind of car, but seeing it in such a setting normalizes that association ever so subtly, not unlike why repetition is an effective strategy to commit something to memory.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every year when I go home for Christmas I watch TV with my parents and I'm always astounded that they pay more money than me to get access to worse content, and it has ads. It's really astounding that folks put up with it.

I think TV remains popular with certain people largely out of ease of use. You can just turn it on and you don't have to make a decision about what to watch. It's always there. Also, changing would require learning something new. People genuinely find learning to have a level of discomfort so they avoid it. https://arstechnica.com/science/2013/03/learning-hurts-your-...

I wonder why Netflix doesn't add a "random content" button. That's one of the appeals of TV versus Netflix that could be replicated very easily.

Something more akin to changing channels like "random cartoon" or "random comedy" would remove one last obstacle in the way of converting cable subscribers.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#127
post #69

Every minute a kid watches a stupid Netflix kids show is a wasted minute they can be stimulating their brain positively instead of numbing it with manufactured industrialized content. Having said that my kids do get a couple hours on the weekend and it's actually fascinating to see what happens when they put the iPad away. It's almost like they need a half hour or so to re-adjust to real life after all the stupid con…

What does that readjustment period look like to you? Pure curiosity.

It's like watching someone come down from a high. Technically they are doing just that. They get pretty intense, very demanding, can't handle the calmness and relatively (to the stupid show they just watched) quiet environment. And they know it too. Both my kids express that finishing watching shows on the iPad doesn't make them feel good. They're very aware of it. Now that it's nice out they would rather skip it altogether and go on a hike early in the morning, so I don't mind so much when they do opt for an iPad kind of morning once in a while.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#128
post #5

I accidentally watched some TV the other day. Having not seen any regular programming for at least a year, I was amazed at how much ... dumber it has become. Also, why did we sit through so many commercials for so long? It feel a little like a twilight zone episode, where we sit there watching a box telling us what to buy.

>where we sit there watching a box telling us what to buy This is no different from YouTube or Facebook. Except those services follow your personally and make shadow profiles of your preferences and sell them to other companies. Is that really better?

Yes, yes it is. I’m astounded your conflate broadcaster cable TV ads with the stuff we see on, say, YouTube. They seem very different to me

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#129
Cue the "I don't even own a TV crowd"....

97% of American Households own a television.

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/business/media/03televisi...

Then right behind them the "I don't subscribe to cable crowd and I don't understand why people do"

75% of households still have cable or satellite.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/24/a-stunning-number-of-ameri...

And I'm one of the 25% that don't subscribe to cable but I refuse to call myself a "cord cutter" because my entertainment still comes across a cord - it's just not coax.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#130

On the other hand, Kids in Netflix only homes are probably not exposed to news and world events that does not come from Facebook and Twitter and other filtered media. They are probably not exposed to opposing or uncomfortable opinions and views. Those Netflix only homes should at least get PBS.

yeah, that was my first thought too. pbs only would be much better: free, not tailored for binge watching, and the cartoons actually end at some point-- on the regular pbs channel at least.
Post reply on HN