Live data from Hacker News

Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

exstreamist.com

81–90 of 462 posts

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#82
post #79
post #5

I accidentally watched some TV the other day. Having not seen any regular programming for at least a year, I was amazed at how much ... dumber it has become. Also, why did we sit through so many commercials for so long? It feel a little like a twilight zone episode, where we sit there watching a box telling us what to buy.

Broadcast has to cater to the largest possible audience while streaming services can create content for niche groups. There's no competition for time slots.

Is that still true? My parents must have over a hundred channels.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the “Frosty the Snowman” special on live TV ran almost 90 minutes... the commercials were agonizing. Also, kids are consuming a lot of highly effective YouTube ads.

Getting rid of adverts on yt for all family is $10/mo, which I'm thinking is not that crazy. It's also a part of Google music family subscription for $15/mo - you get YouTube Red included.

uBlock Origin and similar other add-ons, plus some hostfile entries largely mean I don't see any ads anywhere. I also block them on my router for extra diligence. They simply don't get called. The way it's supposed to be.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#84
post #23

I was thinking about this the other day, and I was wondering whether the fact that my kids are not exposed at all to commercials might make them more susceptible to advertising when they grow up.

A hormesis theory of advertising? I think it’s more likely to be a linear exposure model.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every year when I go home for Christmas I watch TV with my parents and I'm always astounded that they pay more money than me to get access to worse content, and it has ads. It's really astounding that folks put up with it.

I think TV remains popular with certain people largely out of ease of use. You can just turn it on and you don't have to make a decision about what to watch. It's always there. Also, changing would require learning something new. People genuinely find learning to have a level of discomfort so they avoid it. https://arstechnica.com/science/2013/03/learning-hurts-your-...

That’s sort of where I am. Most of it is garbage but there are some channels that during some times of day have some decent stuff on. It’s just random what episode it is.

One thing I’d kind of like on Netflix and their ilk would be a way to choose a series and say “play me a random episode“. Some shows work well that way. I don’t want to have to go choose through six seasons to find something that appeals to me, I’ll just take an episode. Surprise me.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#86
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but you never have to watch what you don’t want, including ads.

If you believe you are not watching ads when you watch Netflix, you need to look into the product placement in their shows. Drinks, watches, cars, clothes, all brands and even quite a few locations... it is all paid for, to entice you to buy.

I was about to suggest that this would be hard in fantasy shows, like Game of Thrones. But on review, there's not much of that on Netflix. It's all contemporary. Interesting...

https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/best-netflix-...

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#87
post #4

Sounds great but the sad reality is that Netflix shows have commercials inside of them. I was really excited about this netflix show "love" until the macdonalds product placement inside of it just made me sick and i stopped watching it. I haven't been watching much original netflix shows since then, but whenever i feel like peeking into a new show i notice product placements pretty soon.

It's not clear to me how the article for this story or any of the articles the story links to accounts for internal advertising. I'm guessing the claim of "being saved" from advertising is flatly not true because the alleged surveying doesn't account for internal ads.

I also question the veracity of the nameless source who allegedly said "Netflix is a godsend. We try to prevent our kids from watching too much TV, but we love being able to put them in front of a Netflix show and know we’re mostly in control of what they’re seeing. We don’t need our kids seeing repetitive ads for new toys or sugary cereals." partially because I don't trust anonymous sources in contexts where anonymity is unnecessary and partially because the whole article is indistinguishable from what I'd expect Netflix to say if they were advertising for themselves via an article.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#88
We've been a no-tv family since forever. We do have a Netflix subscription (though we do find the selection of shows and movies too small, but still...)

My kids have a genuine aversion to commercials. With Netflix and YouTube, they can watch content they choose without the constant interruption and"garbage time" of TV.

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#89
I don't watch much TV, but my wife watches a lot of these shows. The product placement is fairly blatant, and the storylines themselves seem very materialistic.

What if this is not a replacement of advertisement as much as it is a more thoroughly integrated form of it?

I mean, which would you rather be: The guy who pays for a blatant ad that is segregated from the content, or the guy with a slick PR rep who gets your product glowingly mentioned inside the content?

Re: Kids in ‘Netflix Only’ Homes Saved from 230 Hours of Commercials a Year

#90
post #45
post #35

I live in a 'Netflix free' home -- I watch as many commercials a year as a any kid in a 'Netflix only' home. It's not clear to me why the article assumes that not having Netflix means you're consuming commercials.

Would you care to unpack that? The interesting thing about personal anecdotes is when they provide context as to your experience. How many commercials did you watch a year? Do you have a TV? Do you choose not to any media at all? Only movies? How do you compare your experience to others?

I took this as he doesn't watch TV or TV-like content at all.
Post reply on HN