Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think it was meant to draw a comparison between GNUnet and IPv6 That's what I'd intended, yes. I wasn't terribly clear. > I don't believe it's GNU's intention to get the whole world to switch I hope you're right, but they used 'replace'. Them's fightin' words. Normally, projects go out of their way to clarify where hostility is not intended. I seem to recall LLVM/Clang being quite explicit about their not intendi…
> but they used 'replace'. Them's fightin' words. You are welcome to communicate feedback to our (GNUnet) mailinglists. We are in the process of replacing the website (Drupal is good, but doesn't get the job done anymore for us), so if there are problems (even if just interpretation problems or tiny things that throw you off) I invite you to send them to the appropriate mailinglist listed at https://gnunet.org/contac…
The Manual (the pushed content as well as my stacks of old fashioned paper corrections) is not mentioning it. For the new website it (the description) either will be described as it is right now (unlikely) or rewritten to be easier to understand.