Live data from Hacker News

Bitcoin Will Probably Never Be Embraced by the U.S. Government

forbes.com

41–47 of 47 posts

Re: Bitcoin Will Probably Never Be Embraced by the U.S. Government

#41

I need to block Forbes. The number of ads they put up is comparable, and quality of their content is comparable to buzzfeed nowadays

You actually want to block forbes.com/sites/, which contains content from their "contributors " (aka bloggers they lent their name to )

Re: Bitcoin Will Probably Never Be Embraced by the U.S. Government

#42

I need to block Forbes. The number of ads they put up is comparable, and quality of their content is comparable to buzzfeed nowadays

I have adblock installed. Forbes throws up an obnoxious "ADBLOCK DETECTED!" interstitial when I visit, which is a great reminder that their content is rarely worth it anyway.

ctrl-w

Re: Bitcoin Will Probably Never Be Embraced by the U.S. Government

#43
My thinking is that bitcoin/cryptocurrencies dont have to be 'fully' embraced by govt, it just needs to be recognized as a valid asset class and the markets will do the rest. so long as its not too much of a pain to use/keep it will do just fine. what people dont grasp is that the reason govt or central banks dont like any other fiat is that it takes power to inflate away from them. so long as we have fixed references in form of btc/etc markets will ensure they work as inflation hedge (after an unspecified initial period of price discovery ;). In fact I do foresee BTC becoming a legit currency after few unstable currencies fail.

You could argue this was essentially the role of gold but the main problem with gold is that its the central banks that started with biggest ownership of gold so its very susceptible to price manipulation and really un-auditable without some form of trust setup. both of those are not as much of concern with cryptocurrencies.

TLDR: it will be an asset until it becomes a global currency.

Re: Bitcoin Will Probably Never Be Embraced by the U.S. Government

#44

Like, duh. Of course the government won’t embrace Bitcoin. It’s an absolute threat to national sovereignty. Virtual currencies that are not anonymized - no problem. But not Bitcoin.

"It’s an absolute threat to national sovereignty" It's not a threat to anything but speculators bank accounts. Nobody is using BTC as a currency.

Have you read Snow Crash?

Re: Bitcoin Will Probably Never Be Embraced by the U.S. Government

#45
post #39

IMO cryptocurrency is perfectly poised to be the global currency, transcending nation state central banks and leveraging fiat currency foundations via the bank for international settlements. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_for_International_Settlem... The interview with the ex kite surfer and trauma surgeon is his opinions based on his ICO

"Cryptocurrency" can't be "The" global currency since it's not one thing. It's a collection of currencies, and bitcoin itself won't be the global currency because there aren't enough bitcoin to be viable for that purpose in the long run.

Agreed right now it is a collection of currencies, just like all the different denominations of fiat currency (USD, Euro etc). It's not hard to see how a future universal cryptocurrency could emerge though...

Re: Bitcoin Will Probably Never Be Embraced by the U.S. Government

#46
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lot of successful governments use the euro, a currency which they neither own nor control?

I think you underestimate the amount of control they have.

I do not underestimate the amount of control they have.

Their share in the bank was was determined in 1998 on the basis of the states' population and GDP, and adjusted since.

Please by all means do me a favor and educate me on the amount of control a country like Slovenia exerts on ECB monetary policy with its 0.3% capital allocation?

Re: Bitcoin Will Probably Never Be Embraced by the U.S. Government

#47
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you underestimate the amount of control they have.

I do not underestimate the amount of control they have. Their share in the bank was was determined in 1998 on the basis of the states' population and GDP, and adjusted since. Please by all means do me a favor and educate me on the amount of control a country like Slovenia exerts on ECB monetary policy with its 0.3% capital allocation?

Slovenia can abandon the Euro at any time. This power sit's on top of any other they gain being part of the collective.

Countries use the Euro because it's useful for them to use the Euro, if it's stops being useful they drop it.

Post reply on HN