Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
41–50 of 62 posts
Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#42It's less about having/not having 'foo' and more about letting or not letting 'foo' dominate your life. In the case of cell phones 'foo' is the cellphone as well as all the people trying to contact you through it. I never answer a call I don't recognize, I check the vmail afterwards. If they don't leave one, oh well guess they didn't need to talk to me that bad. I often don't anser the phone when someone I know does…
Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#43Seriously, what is it with you yanks? "I used [something most people use] every minute of every day, but I decided to stop using [that something] alltogether and now I feel [free/empowered/at peace/intellectually stimulated/etc]." What about moderation?
The key here isn't that you aren't carrying a cellphone... it's that the people trying to contact you know you aren't carrying a cellphone.
Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#44Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#45Seriously, what is it with you yanks? "I used [something most people use] every minute of every day, but I decided to stop using [that something] alltogether and now I feel [free/empowered/at peace/intellectually stimulated/etc]." What about moderation?
The key here isn't that you aren't carrying a cellphone... it's that the people trying to contact you know you aren't carrying a cellphone.
Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#46A common factor of these famous people who do not use a cell phone: they have at least one assistant/secretary.
Not at all. In almost all cases, it's a self-maintained illusion that the people that call you cannot wait for a few minutes or hours to hear back from you. Sure, it might be annoying to someone that they didn't get to talk to you, but rarely does it actually make a difference.
Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not at all. In almost all cases, it's a self-maintained illusion that the people that call you cannot wait for a few minutes or hours to hear back from you. Sure, it might be annoying to someone that they didn't get to talk to you, but rarely does it actually make a difference.
Text messaging wastes far less time, and leaves time for more interesting pursuits than trying to quickly, extemporaneously, condense the purpose of your call into the space allotted by voicemail. Without my Droid, my conversations would consist of a lot more bookkeeping.
Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#48Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#49Absolutely. I managed to successfully evade cell phone ownership for years and it was dramatically empowering. It also made me develop a pretty strong distaste for our cultural addiction to instant communication. In fact, it's become at least a small part of my definition of success. I am not a concierge. I do not await phone calls with the longing of a teenager on Friday night. My peace and leisure cannot be disturb…
Like any other development tool, you can leave the smartphone on your desk. No need to carry it around.
Imagine trying to develop a web application if you only used a browser on your own development and production website (ie: that you otherwise "left it on your desk")
Re: Not having a cell phone means that the world has to run on your time
#50But I think they've gotten used to my behavior. Maybe.