Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://xmr.to/ looks waaaay too complicated for the average person to use, which is a nonstarter for the average person. And it still processes a Bitcoin transaction, correct? So it will be no faster than Bitcoin?
> https://xmr.to/ looks waaaay too complicated for the average person to use, which is a nonstarter for the average person. OK, that's fine, but services like that could - and will - get much friendlier. I'm just rebutting the quote which is the blanket "no one transacts in cryptocurrency" which is certainly not true for me, even though I felt that way just 2 months ago. Now that I am an active miner of various curre…
MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
41–50 of 258 posts
Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#42> "Nobody actually transacts in cryptocurrency," Goldbard says. "So making something that people can actually use is our first goal. And then we want to find additional ways that people can implement it over time. But initially all we want is to make it so people can actually complete transactions." Amen. Too few projects have this focus.
Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#43> "Nobody actually transacts in cryptocurrency," Goldbard says. "So making something that people can actually use is our first goal. And then we want to find additional ways that people can implement it over time. But initially all we want is to make it so people can actually complete transactions." Amen. Too few projects have this focus.
Doesn't lightning network fix this problem?
Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#44Wow. MM is really going all-in on for Software Guard Extensions (secure enclave) on the server. What does HN say? Do we trust Intel (motivation and implementation) that much?
Intel's implementation is considerably worse than that. Even if you assume the hardware itself isn't compromised, every remote attestation has to go through the "Intel Attestation Service" which has no end-to-end protection. The IAS is what actually validates the enclave's signature, and it returns a "success" or "failure" message which is signed with an Intel key. But there's absolutely no technical measure that prevents Intel from being compelled to sign a falsified response; a client would have no way of telling the difference.
This is documented by Intel [1] and I'm hardly the first to notice it [2] but people still seem to talk about SGX as if compromising it is equivalent to backdooring the CPU, which is inaccurate.
[1]: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-software-gua...
[2]: https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-17/thursday/us-17-Swami-SGX...
Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#45Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#46Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#47David Mazières’ paper[0] displays strong insights and proofs into the structure of byzantine systems with open membership.
[0]: https://www.stellar.org/papers/stellar-consensus-protocol.pd...
I wonder where the code for MobileCoin is, or when it will get open-sourced. All GitHub yields currently is this clearly non-affiliated project: https://github.com/mobilecoind/mobilecoin.
Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#48Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#49Re: MobileCoin: A New Cryptocurrency from Moxie Marlinspike
#50MobileCoin is backed by XLM/Stellar, which is not decentralized, and so I feel I should note here that I signed up during Stripe's giveaway of Stellar Lumens years ago - and I did indeed get my wallet credited. https://stripe.com/blog/stellar I was given 6000 XLM and I left it in their official wallet for years. On May 12th, 2017 I wrote them an email asking why my wallet, now converted to some newer official wallet,…