Live data from Hacker News

Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

bloomberg.com

1–10 of 41 posts

Re: Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

#2
First, we should accelerate building better robots to do the work of humans, then send thousands throughout the solar system. This will be cheaper and faster than manned space flight...

Anyway, I went through this a few years ago on HN after the Virgin Galactic accident. People argued that it was only a minor setback. Any setback that involves humans costs a lot of money and time.

Re: Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

#3
Can you really get to the moon with just $90M? My impression is that SpaceX is just about the cheapest launch provider currently available, and they charge something like $50-60M to get to orbit. And then you need to do all the tech required to land on the lunar surface as well.

Do they anticipate getting additional funding or decreasing costs?

Re: Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

#4

Can you really get to the moon with just $90M? My impression is that SpaceX is just about the cheapest launch provider currently available, and they charge something like $50-60M to get to orbit. And then you need to do all the tech required to land on the lunar surface as well. Do they anticipate getting additional funding or decreasing costs?

https://lunar.xprize.org

Re: Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

#5
post #2

First, we should accelerate building better robots to do the work of humans, then send thousands throughout the solar system. This will be cheaper and faster than manned space flight... Anyway, I went through this a few years ago on HN after the Virgin Galactic accident. People argued that it was only a minor setback. Any setback that involves humans costs a lot of money and time.

Such a simple and elegant solution. We could also upload our minds into said robots remotely.

Re: Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

#6
post #5
post #2

First, we should accelerate building better robots to do the work of humans, then send thousands throughout the solar system. This will be cheaper and faster than manned space flight... Anyway, I went through this a few years ago on HN after the Virgin Galactic accident. People argued that it was only a minor setback. Any setback that involves humans costs a lot of money and time.

Such a simple and elegant solution. We could also upload our minds into said robots remotely.

So simple!

Re: Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

#7

Can you really get to the moon with just $90M? My impression is that SpaceX is just about the cheapest launch provider currently available, and they charge something like $50-60M to get to orbit. And then you need to do all the tech required to land on the lunar surface as well. Do they anticipate getting additional funding or decreasing costs?

They're the cheapest (probably) per kilogram; but if you're willing to settle for smaller payloads, you can get to orbit for quite a lot cheaper. For example, the European Vega will get you 2.5T to LEO for under $40M. Half your budget on launch costs isn't bad.

Re: Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

#9
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Such a simple and elegant solution. We could also upload our minds into said robots remotely.

So simple!

No one said it would be easy. You guys added that. It would be difficult and expensive, but cheaper, faster, and easier than man space flight.

Re: Japanese startup Ispace raises $90M, targets landing on moon surface by 2020

#10

Can you really get to the moon with just $90M? My impression is that SpaceX is just about the cheapest launch provider currently available, and they charge something like $50-60M to get to orbit. And then you need to do all the tech required to land on the lunar surface as well. Do they anticipate getting additional funding or decreasing costs?

It costs roughly $4000/lb to LEO, and the rocket equation makes the whole thing pretty unforgiving with current tech.
Post reply on HN