Wonder if and when we’ll see decent Excel/Word replacements from Amazon, perhaps coupled with a thin Linux distro. At that point you’d be able to completely do away with Microsoft in many organisations, and Amazon could simply gobble up those dollars. They’ve got enough money they could make it work.
They have Amazon WorkDocs and Amazon WorkMail. I've never seen them in the wild though...
AWS Single Sign-On
71–80 of 119 posts
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#72I lost my phone 2 weeks ago and i lost access to the reauth phone number years ago. I have not been able to get this resolved all this time. The German Website support is clueless about 2FA (that was recently introduced) and AWS support wants a form signed by an US Notary (which are hard to come by in Germany).... Really annoying
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Out of curiosity (and ignorance), why SAML vs JWT or some less awful protocol?
JWT is also an awful protocol, and it's also not an SSO standard. There's still time for us not to bet the farm on JWT, and I urge clients to avoid it.
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#74If this is interesting to you but you're iffy about setting up another directory service or having AWS be your central list of identities for all your apps, we're open sourcing The Identity Mutilator, a Golang SAML IdP, in a couple weeks. It's self-contained (for now) so doesn't depend on AD or LDAP --- just Postgres --- and runs just fine in a tiny Docker container.
As the author of a pluggable OAuth2 & OIDC Provider ( https://github.com/ory/hydra ) I am looking for an OSS IDP that solves just ID management. Is there a URL where I can expect this to land?
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's the advantage of your thing over, say, LDAP?
It's an SSO system, so think LDAP plus a "universal login page" for all your applications. Ours is a stripped down, carefully audited Golang application that does TOTP and U2F. But, like all modern SSO systems, we (unfortunately) speak SAML --- a godawful protocol, but one we did a from-scratch implementation of to avoid crazy deps.
Edit: Never mind... I read further up. Looking forward to seeing it!
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#76If this is interesting to you but you're iffy about setting up another directory service or having AWS be your central list of identities for all your apps, we're open sourcing The Identity Mutilator, a Golang SAML IdP, in a couple weeks. It's self-contained (for now) so doesn't depend on AD or LDAP --- just Postgres --- and runs just fine in a tiny Docker container.
As the author of a pluggable OAuth2 & OIDC Provider ( https://github.com/ory/hydra ) I am looking for an OSS IDP that solves just ID management. Is there a URL where I can expect this to land?
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's an SSO system, so think LDAP plus a "universal login page" for all your applications. Ours is a stripped down, carefully audited Golang application that does TOTP and U2F. But, like all modern SSO systems, we (unfortunately) speak SAML --- a godawful protocol, but one we did a from-scratch implementation of to avoid crazy deps.
> SAML --- a godawful protocol, but one we did a from-scratch implementation of to avoid crazy deps. Agree that SAML is godawful (to put it lightly) and also very curious about your from-scratch implementation. I assume that by "crazy deps" you're referring to xmlsec1 (which, disturbingly, nearly every non Java/.NET library uses) Did you implement XML-DSig yourself? (!) I'd be very interested in comparing notes on te…
In fact, I wrote the kernel of the IdP after writing my own SAML test suite (after being horrified by the quality of SAML client libraries). I'm very happy to compare notes!
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
JWT is also an awful protocol, and it's also not an SSO standard. There's still time for us not to bet the farm on JWT, and I urge clients to avoid it.
Can you please elaborate on what's awful about JWT/OIDC? I ask because I've implemented SAML-based IdPs and SPs before, and SAML is a serious trainwreck of a protocol. Now I'm looking at implementing OIDC and at first glance it seems a lot more reasonable.
* SAML has no alg=none.
* JWT doesn't have "signature smuggling" problems.
* SAML has schema validation.
* SAML has more de-facto-required protective metadata (like audience restrictions).
They are both truly terrible. Perhaps even a coinflip decision. But SAML is an actual real-world standard; it's how applications implement SSO. JWT is still floundering around trying to find a place to be essential. Let's hope it fails.
Part of the point of implementing SAML was to implement a stripped-down version of it with none of the flexibility offered by libxmlsec1, which is the kernel for basically every SAML implementation.
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
JWT is also an awful protocol, and it's also not an SSO standard. There's still time for us not to bet the farm on JWT, and I urge clients to avoid it.
Is there a non-awful protocol to bet on?
Re: AWS Single Sign-On
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
As the author of a pluggable OAuth2 & OIDC Provider ( https://github.com/ory/hydra ) I am looking for an OSS IDP that solves just ID management. Is there a URL where I can expect this to land?
What about Keycloak ( http://www.keycloak.org/ )?