We need a Wikipedia for data
bret.appspot.com
We need a Wikipedia for data
1–10 of 56 posts
Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#2Sounds a lot like what I think Freebase [http://www.freebase.com/] are trying to do.
Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#3Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#4Free vector map data is growing: http://openstreetmap.org . They recently got donated the whole Netherlands.
Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#5Isn't Metaweb's Freebase (http://www.freebase.com/) doing this?
Check it out if you have not seen this before, these guys are Rockstars!!
Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#6It's like freebase all right, but the article has something right about adoption. He points out some big company would have to donate a great starting dataset to drive adoption.
I think this is one problem with Freebase. Another problem I see is the structuring of the data, it is a hurdle to sharing.
Finally the last problem I see is Data is currently very much seen as a competitive advantage. When Google introduce functionalities to make corrections on Google Maps, I don’t think they do it to share with everyone else. They do it because they want Google Maps to be the destination with the best possible data. A wiki of data is a great idea, but I’m not sure we have the solution yet.
Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#7Regarding (some) stocks: http://blog.infochimps.org/2008/03/20/stock-market-dataset-i...
Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#8Joel had an article on "commoditizing your complements": http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/StrategyLetterV.html . Of course we want to commoditize data, to raise the value of hackers (raise the expected return from hacking). On the other side, data companies want to commoditize hackers, to raise the value of data... a process we are sure to resent.
Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#9Have you heard of freebase? From what I've read online, I think they are doing something like this.
Re: We need a Wikipedia for data
#10Bret is spot on. Open data would unlock a vast amount of wealth. Other suggestions:
A collection of various kinds of texts, translated into 20-30 different languages. 100 million words (per language) would be fine.
20 minutes of text, spoken in thousands of different voices/accents.