> he diet was a formula of 825–853 calories per day for 3 to 5 months, followed by the stepped reintroduction of food over two to eight weeks. That is going to be a brutal 3-5 months. Worth it in the end though. Also, c'mon, a range of 825-853 calories? Nobody is counting calories that accurately and it would have been better to say "roughly 850 kCal per day".
It's tough not only to cut back the calories, but to pack needed nutrients into the few calories remaining. Over several months you could accidentally end up with a severe deficiency of something.
Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
11–20 of 271 posts
Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#12Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#13> he diet was a formula of 825–853 calories per day for 3 to 5 months, followed by the stepped reintroduction of food over two to eight weeks. That is going to be a brutal 3-5 months. Worth it in the end though. Also, c'mon, a range of 825-853 calories? Nobody is counting calories that accurately and it would have been better to say "roughly 850 kCal per day".
The paper says: > ... total diet replacement (825–853 kcal/day formula diet for 3–5 months), stepped food reintroduction (2–8 weeks) ... That sounds to me like participants were given a professionally prepared formula to consume instead of food, so the calorie counts might be that accurate.
Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#14Type 2 diabetes is a solved problem, but pharmaceutical companies have yet to find a way to make money from a water fast, so no one tells people about it.
Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#15Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#16Type 2 diabetes is a solved problem, but pharmaceutical companies have yet to find a way to make money from a water fast, so no one tells people about it.
Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's tough not only to cut back the calories, but to pack needed nutrients into the few calories remaining. Over several months you could accidentally end up with a severe deficiency of something.
Soylent.
I miss the pancake batter taste of Soylent, don’t miss being fat.
Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#18Type 2 diabetes is a solved problem, but pharmaceutical companies have yet to find a way to make money from a water fast, so no one tells people about it.
1/3rd of Americans (over 100 million people) have, or are well on their way to having, Type 2 Diabetes. This is one o the largest cash cows of Big Pharma.
They don't want to fix it, their bottom line depends on this never being fixed, and they will do anything in their power to make sure it is never fixed.
Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
The paper says: > ... total diet replacement (825–853 kcal/day formula diet for 3–5 months), stepped food reintroduction (2–8 weeks) ... That sounds to me like participants were given a professionally prepared formula to consume instead of food, so the calorie counts might be that accurate.
I think in the previous post that was on HN about this they were interviewing a lady that said she was eating some powder that "had all the nutrients", which sounds like something similar to Soylent.
Re: Radical diet can reverse type 2 diabetes, new study shows
#20I went on a medically-supervised, very low calorie and low carb (keto) diet after being diagnosed with diabetes. A few months and about 50lbs in, I had no signs of insulin resistance whatsoever, my A1C was down to completely normal values, and I was able to discontinue my medication entirely. That diagnosis, as hard as it was to hear, was one of the absolute best things to ever happen to me.
Does this exist for non-diabetic patients? I recently had weight gain for the first time of my life after reaching 30yrs of age and always being underweight. I've been meaning to look into some diet-based approaches that would be supported by science, but Googling it has always been a deluge of pseudo-science.