Live data from Hacker News

The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

theguardian.com

31–40 of 391 posts

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#31
post #25

The amazing thing is the median age of farmers in the USA is ~56. In the next ten years over half are retire-able. Who is going to take over? Corporations or the current immigrant workers? Its a huge change for most of the country.

This assumes they are able to retire. Given the financial outlooks presented in the article, I think retiring is not in the books for these farmers.

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#32
post #26

Local farm services guy had this to say: "Used to buy truckloads of fertilizer, then the coop would buy train car loads and undercut us. So we bought a train car - they bought a train. We bought a train - they bought a barge. The margins are disappearing entirely" Almost everybody is being squeezed out by 'economies of scale'. And its going to get worse, when we start making simple foodstuffs electrically (starch, su…

The first thing I learned when I started working life in a store was: "We do not compete by undercutting the competition. That will kill us both."

But, corn is corn. There's no winning in a commodity market. And grain is the classic commodity.

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#34
post #22
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is that a valid criticism? Doesn't that just boil down to "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?"

> Doesn't that just boil down to "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?" Is that not a valid criticism?

Of what?

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#35
post #22
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is that a valid criticism? Doesn't that just boil down to "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?"

> Doesn't that just boil down to "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?" Is that not a valid criticism?

I guess my hang up is that it seems pretty self-evident. Yeah, money makes things easier. I don't think any of the software developers on this site making 3-5x the median individual wage will argue against that. Assuming for a moment that "money buys things" is a valid criticism of some independently wealthy software developer buying a farm (?), what's the proposed solution to that?

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#36
post #29
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is that a valid criticism? Doesn't that just boil down to "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?"

It's not criticism, it's responding to the question asked. Q: How do we reconcile on the one hand farmers by trade leaving and wannabe farmers wanting to join a farm life? A: "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?"

That's fair but the comment I was replying to posed it as a criticism (maybe that it was posed as a criticism in the original thread, which I have only a vague recollection of). That's what confused me. I agree it seems like a perfectly valid response.

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#37
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember that discussion. I also remember the major criticism was that a good portion of the people who are moving from tech to farming were already independently wealthy enough to bootstrap their farm into a good place. And on top of that getting to choose where their farm is located. Contrast that with a farmer who may have inherited what he has from his parents and may not be in as good a financial state, or the…

Why is that a valid criticism? Doesn't that just boil down to "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?"

The point is that a rich software developer's idyllic romanticized farming experience might not match with an actual farmer's soul-crushing experience. That's the reconciliation.

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this for philosophical reasons about taxes and government? Or is it just a big chunk of money they're trying to save?

I think both, but is it really saving money if you personally are unable to buy food after a bad season?

Governments need to subsidies farming even more. In India farmers generally don't have to pay income taxes.

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#39
post #35
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Doesn't that just boil down to "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?" Is that not a valid criticism?

I guess my hang up is that it seems pretty self-evident. Yeah, money makes things easier. I don't think any of the software developers on this site making 3-5x the median individual wage will argue against that. Assuming for a moment that "money buys things" is a valid criticism of some independently wealthy software developer buying a farm (?), what's the proposed solution to that?

Instead of "criticism" read takeaway or insight, rather than criticism of the preference. I think they are saying, the new farmers can choose that path because they have fall back, not that they have a better farming plan or better farming insight over generational farmers.

Re: The suicide rate for farmers in the U.S. is more than double that of veterans

#40

I have family that farms in Iowa and I also worked in the agriculture industry there for a while after leaving the military. One thing that increases the stress on the farmers is the way they avoid income taxes at all costs so they rarely save any of the profits from good years to help them float during the bad years. This is all anecdotal but I have personally talked with several farmers that would rather buy new eq…

> The farmers would talk about struggling, but have a brand new semi-tractor sitting in a barn unused 10 months out of the year.

Your business having a illiquid depreciating asset that is required for the business to function can still be struggling. You can't eat a combine, you can't trade it away.

This is usually solved with coops owning the equipment and time sharing it to distribute the costs among the coop participants.

Farmers are indentured servants to the commodities markets, the land owner's they rent their land from, and John Deere.

Post reply on HN