How do you define "digital currency"? Under US legal tender laws BTC isn't money. You can incur capital gains when you exchange BTC for something over the basis you acquired it for, but you essentially gave smoothing of value away for something ephemeral.
I'm waiting for the law to get so vague, they accidentally cover in-app/in-game currencies with legislation that requires it to be regulated.
US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
21–30 of 187 posts
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#22Where's the problem? Can someone explain? It's not like this bans owning Bitcoin.
Your grandpa dies and you inherit his estate. There's a bunch of boxes and you go thru a lot of them until you get to one of his war stuff. It is too much and you put it aside. Years later, you are prosecuted under this law because it turns out he had a hardware wallet in that box. That's the problem, and it doesn't matter if you think it's not something that is likely. Truth of the matter is, you committed no crime.…
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#23Of course the justification is to "stop money laundering and terrorist financing".
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#24Gay rights couldn't be resisted in the age of the internet when everyone knew their cousin or that guy they went to work with was gay.... will be the same thing with bitcoin.
Question is, just how violent and authoritarian the tyrants in DC want to get.
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#25Of course the justification is to "stop money laundering and terrorist financing".
Eh did you notice that huge tax cut they just gave the ultra-rich? They gotta start digging through the couch to pay for it ;)
For example, the US is radically more progressive on taxation than all of Scandinavia:
https://taxfoundation.org/how-scandinavian-countries-pay-the...
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh did you notice that huge tax cut they just gave the ultra-rich? They gotta start digging through the couch to pay for it ;)
The US has the most progressive taxation system among all developed nations. Nothing about that fundamental progressiveness has changed due to the tax cuts. The top 20% are paying 95% of all income taxes, that will continue. For example, the US is radically more progressive on taxation than all of Scandinavia: https://taxfoundation.org/how-scandinavian-countries-pay-the...
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's the problem with being required to send a plaintext copy of every encrypted email to various government agencies around the world? It's not like that would ban using encrypted email.
What the problem with being required to report your income from various government agencies around the world? It's not like that would ban governments from existing, surely some people will continue to voluntarily pay some taxes on the honor system.
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#28Where's the problem? Can someone explain? It's not like this bans owning Bitcoin.
2nd layer solutions would provide fungibility and ultimate privacy. Cryptocurrencies like Zcash, Dash or Monero, especially Monero, could be illegal.
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#29Is there any evidence of Bitcoin being used by terrorist groups? Wouldn't that be a terrible idea for the terrorists?
Also, it reduces the threats posed by governments against their own people. Government repression, like that seen in Venezuela or for a more extreme example, North Korea, can kill far more people than non-state terrorism, and tools that empower individuals help resist that.
Re: US Senate Bill S.1241 to Criminalize Concealed Ownership of Bitcoin
#30Bank secrecy is dead* To imagine that bitcoin could change that or not abide is foolishness. * for poor people anyway, with poor meaning < $10 mil which affords you lawyers and offshore shell companies
Well, bank secrecy is as dead as governments can make it, for obvious reasons. However, for cryptocurrencies, it's mainly exchange interfaces with meatspace currencies that are hard to keep private. If you use local wallets like Electrum, transact via Tor, mix thoroughly, and generally practice good OPSEC, your personas and their cryptocurrency can be as anonymous as you like. But only as long as you maintain compart…