> , a Nobel laureate in economics, said recently that bitcoin "ought to be outlawed” because it’s designed to evade regulation and "doesn’t serve any socially useful function." A world where if something is not required it is forbidden is not a world that I want any part of Nobel winner or otherwise.
The Nobel prize in Economics isn't a real Alfred Nobel prize as set aside in his 1985 will, either... So you're not the only one :).
All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
81–90 of 109 posts
Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it's going to look like a bunch of dudes printed themselves a fortune and then convinced the rest of the world to buy it from them. Just like fiat money.
You can dislike how much fiat the government prints (I do too!), but at least when the government prints money the profit goes towards things that benefit the public (bridges, defense, schools, etc.), some corruption notwithstanding.
Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#83Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#84I am really sad that Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency that ever managed to touch "mainstream" (it's on Steam, it has Stripe support, etc) and we fucked it up so hard that you need a $4 fee just to pay for one thing with it . I was really hoping it would catch on as a medium of exchange, because there's value in being able to pay for things quickly, cheaply and without giving people a bunch of info, but nope. Digita…
It blows my mind that a forum with mostly technically people (hacker news) is constantly awash with blockchain fanatics. Have you people never had a scaling problem? Understanding how well different systems can scale is one of the core competencies required by developers and blockchains are fundamentally designed not to scale because increasing the number of nodes just increases your "trust" in the system.
You have to try, even if you know you can't solve all of the problems yet.
Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like many, you’re not aware that the Lightning Network is on its way and will solve most of these issues. Moreover, transactions between Segwit-compatible wallets is pretty fast and cheap. I’m kind of tired to hear people complain about the fees while all they have to do is use a different wallet that supports Segwit. Edit: Ah, the downvotes. I was expecting them.
Maybe I don't fully understand it but from what I've gathered, the Lightning Network is a plan to enable people to do transactions outside of the main blockchain and eventually sync them back. It seems to get touted as a magical plan to solve Bitcoin's scaling problems, but unless I'm missing something (which tbf is very possible) it seems more like a plan for bitcoin to abrogate its primary original purpose of handl…
This sums it up pretty well.
Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
So... I totally agree that the transaction fees are much too high. But it doesn't bother me as much as it bothers many people because every time I start getting upset, I remember that VISA's fees are 1.5%, PayPal's fees are 3%; basically everything has transaction fees and the world has not come crashing down on them.
But why would anyone spend days downloading the blockchain, significantly increase their data management and opsec responsibilities and cede their usual consumer rights in order to have the same transaction fees as Paypal? The only reason I can think of is in order to evade various kinds of regulation, but presumably that won't last forever.
Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
But why would anyone spend days downloading the blockchain, significantly increase their data management and opsec responsibilities and cede their usual consumer rights in order to have the same transaction fees as Paypal? The only reason I can think of is in order to evade various kinds of regulation, but presumably that won't last forever.
Yeah nobody downloads the whole blockchain lmao, 2012 called and wants its argument back
Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like many, you’re not aware that the Lightning Network is on its way and will solve most of these issues. Moreover, transactions between Segwit-compatible wallets is pretty fast and cheap. I’m kind of tired to hear people complain about the fees while all they have to do is use a different wallet that supports Segwit. Edit: Ah, the downvotes. I was expecting them.
Maybe I don't fully understand it but from what I've gathered, the Lightning Network is a plan to enable people to do transactions outside of the main blockchain and eventually sync them back. It seems to get touted as a magical plan to solve Bitcoin's scaling problems, but unless I'm missing something (which tbf is very possible) it seems more like a plan for bitcoin to abrogate its primary original purpose of handl…
Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#89Something I rarely see discussed is the gender breakdown of bitcoin ownership. I'd be surprised if it wasn't something like 90%+ men mining, trading, and owning bitcoin. If bitcoin really takes over the world, it's going to look like a bunch of dudes printed themselves a fortune and then convinced the rest of the world to buy it from them.
(Not saying one sex is better than another, as in different situations, different traits will succeeded. And not saying that all people of a particular sex must take on these traits, but rather only these are tendencies observed in scientific studies.)
Re: All You Need to Know About Bitcoin's Rise, from $0.01 to $11,000
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like many, you’re not aware that the Lightning Network is on its way and will solve most of these issues. Moreover, transactions between Segwit-compatible wallets is pretty fast and cheap. I’m kind of tired to hear people complain about the fees while all they have to do is use a different wallet that supports Segwit. Edit: Ah, the downvotes. I was expecting them.
So the proposed solution for scaling bitcoin is to avoid use of the blockchain whenever possible.