Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes I understand that. I do not think that the names of informers or any personal data really should have been published. There was hardly any need for that. The value is in the actual things done or said and I doubt it really matters by who as we know they are from soldiers down there documenting these events uncensored. So obviously the names should have not been leaked, but I doubt that was in any way intentional.…
You're assuming that all I'm (and those at the pentagon) concerned about is names. This leak is over a year old. They're not going to get much in the way of here-and-now. But now we have a leak that goes into detail about how we operate. It's already a pain in the ass fighting people that look the same. We don't need to shed any light onto how we do what we do.
Re: Wikileaks Must Be Stopped
#211Why? If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear. That is the favourite thing of the police, which is the executive, which encompasses the army.