Live data from Hacker News

YouTube monetization analysis

docs.google.com

91–100 of 168 posts

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#91
post #66
post #52

I am almost certain another factor is clickthrough from "undesirable" referral links. ReviewBrah [0] (The Report of The Week) is the most family friendly channel with high subscribers that I can think of. He reviews fast food and has a unique fashion style and personality. Very clean. He has become a popular meme and is regularly linked to from 4chan. I struggle to find a single thing that could warrant demonetisatio…

The only other factor I can think of with ReviewBrah is that he's often negatively reviewing products from huge companies (fast food chains) that might advertise on YouTube. Would Burger King want to run an ad before he reviews chicken fries or whatever?

There are a huge number of other food reviewers that don't have the same issues with demonitization, even if they have slightly less ad-friendly content. That said, it's a good suggestion; it's much easier to find a way to shoot down your suggestion than it is to think of it.

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#92
post #68
post #52

I am almost certain another factor is clickthrough from "undesirable" referral links. ReviewBrah [0] (The Report of The Week) is the most family friendly channel with high subscribers that I can think of. He reviews fast food and has a unique fashion style and personality. Very clean. He has become a popular meme and is regularly linked to from 4chan. I struggle to find a single thing that could warrant demonetisatio…

Or it's possible that people from those sources report his videos. But my own videos get demonetized almost instantly and none of mine have weird referral links as far as I can tell.

Good point, it very well could be. However, I'm inclined to think that this isn't the case, solely from how much positive feedback he gets, as well as how little negative comments he gets. I mean, finding a negative comment about ReviewBrah on any of the Chans is nigh impossible.

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#93
post #86
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I make programming videos too, and a similar thing happens to me. The first day I release a video it's demonetized, and even if I don't request a manual review the video will be remonetized a couple days later.

Interesting. Maybe YouTube needs to adjust their algorithm for that category or something.

I'd bet this behavior is their algorithm "working as intended".

Aka, advertisers saying they don't want to waste ad spend on worthless programming videos. So they get demonetized for the first few days to reduce the impact of any ad spend on the times that would be most likely to get views, then turn it on so the drip of ad spend can treat the videos like problem children.

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#94
post #5

Serious question: what is HTBQ+? Googling doesn't seem to turn anything up.

That's so last year, it now: LGGBTQQIAAPPK more coming soon https://definithing.com/lggbtqqiaappk/

We've already asked you not to the guidelines with unsubstantive inflammatory comments. Could you please stop?

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#95
post #93
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting. Maybe YouTube needs to adjust their algorithm for that category or something.

I'd bet this behavior is their algorithm "working as intended". Aka, advertisers saying they don't want to waste ad spend on worthless programming videos. So they get demonetized for the first few days to reduce the impact of any ad spend on the times that would be most likely to get views, then turn it on so the drip of ad spend can treat the videos like problem children.

I'm more inclined to think that the algorithms are just a bit naive at this point. Surely some advertisers out there do want to target that market.

The notice on my videos is: Limited or no ads due to content identified as not suitable for most advertisers[1]. Your video remains fully playable and is eligible to earn subscription revenue from YouTube Red.

[1] https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6162278?hl=en

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#96
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only other factor I can think of with ReviewBrah is that he's often negatively reviewing products from huge companies (fast food chains) that might advertise on YouTube. Would Burger King want to run an ad before he reviews chicken fries or whatever?

There are a huge number of other food reviewers that don't have the same issues with demonitization, even if they have slightly less ad-friendly content. That said, it's a good suggestion; it's much easier to find a way to shoot down your suggestion than it is to think of it.

> it's much easier to find a way to shoot down your suggestion than it is to think of it.

words of wisdom, I would do well to remember them.

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#97
post #77
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>In other words, if you video has ads, then the probability of appearing in searches and related content is higher So users that permit ads on their video get a virtual "fast lane" on the Comcast internet service. You know, I'm sick and tired of these internet service providers violating Net Neutrality principles. Oh, wait. It's YouTube? Oh, that's fine then./s

Youtube not providing extra promotion for content is different from Comcast charging extra to even access that content.

[deleted]

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#99
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or it's possible that people from those sources report his videos. But my own videos get demonetized almost instantly and none of mine have weird referral links as far as I can tell.

Good point, it very well could be. However, I'm inclined to think that this isn't the case, solely from how much positive feedback he gets, as well as how little negative comments he gets. I mean, finding a negative comment about ReviewBrah on any of the Chans is nigh impossible.

Predicting the behavior of 4chan seems nigh impossible to me.

Re: YouTube monetization analysis

#100
post #66
post #52

I am almost certain another factor is clickthrough from "undesirable" referral links. ReviewBrah [0] (The Report of The Week) is the most family friendly channel with high subscribers that I can think of. He reviews fast food and has a unique fashion style and personality. Very clean. He has become a popular meme and is regularly linked to from 4chan. I struggle to find a single thing that could warrant demonetisatio…

The only other factor I can think of with ReviewBrah is that he's often negatively reviewing products from huge companies (fast food chains) that might advertise on YouTube. Would Burger King want to run an ad before he reviews chicken fries or whatever?

Criticising products is totally fine, otherwise all video game or movie reviewers would be demonized. Demonetization is for "upsetting" content from a brand perspective (terrorism, catastrophe, sex, violence, ...), but the models get it wrong from time to time.
Post reply on HN