YouTube monetization analysis
docs.google.com
YouTube monetization analysis
1–10 of 168 posts
Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#2Those tweets claim that demonetized videos don't reach anyone on the homepage. Do they reach anyone on the Subscriptions page?
For me, the Subscriptions page pretty much replaced the homepage, and it would be bad for me as a consumer if the channels I subscribe to don't end up on that page once they upload new content.
Also, I'm mildly annoyed by the lack of consistency with spelling of the word "YouTube" in this analysis. It's neither "Youtube" nor "youtube" (both of those spelling are used multiple times), it's YouTube.
Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#3Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#4Sounds like a slippery slope argument.
Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#5Googling doesn't seem to turn anything up.
Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#6https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube
It's a federated tube that uses ActivityPub and WebTorrent. I think this platform should be invested in and creators should consider moving. The interests of YouTube and its creators will never be entirely aligned.
Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#7Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#8Serious question: what is HTBQ+? Googling doesn't seem to turn anything up.
Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#9Serious question: what is HTBQ+? Googling doesn't seem to turn anything up.
Re: YouTube monetization analysis
#10Serious question: what is HTBQ+? Googling doesn't seem to turn anything up.