Live data from Hacker News

Evidence that collaboration results in group-think and mediocrity

inc.com

61–63 of 63 posts

Re: Evidence that collaboration results in group-think and mediocrity

#61
post #8

Creativity seems unimpeded when the one being creative is at the very top of the hierarchy. It doesn't really work for anyone else unless they have a direct contribution and connection to the dictator though. Any requirement that new stuff be reviewed by committee (e.g. a board of directors) will tend to destroy anything truly innovative. Why? Because the creative people can see much further than the (much less invol…

Elon Musk does have oversight, in the form of his investors. His creative vision had to pass through the scrutiny of the boards of those companies and individuals which invested in Tesla and SpaceX. There's also plenty of cases of actual employees being innovative. The work produced by employees of SRI (e.g. Douglas Engelbart's team) and of Bell Labs eclipses Tesla and SpaceX in terms of innovation.

Musk has nominal oversight, but that has nothing to do with his creativity. The BOD didn’t come up with how to reuse boosters.

People are creative. Groups are not. Elon and Englebart likely developed new ideas that were sparked by conversations with others, but that’s far different than committee meetings.

Re: Evidence that collaboration results in group-think and mediocrity

#62

Groupthink is the loss of critical thinking as a consequence of cohesion and conflict avoidance. Groupthink can be avoided if the culture rewards critical thinking. That includes: - team members should be free to dissent from the majority if there's a reason. - team members should keep a reasonable level of skepticism when it comes to other members' claims. if someone shows high confidence, that confidence should be…

The problem is that these principles are counter to his normal social relationships work. For example, if your boss is on the majority side, it’s significantly harder for most people to dissent. Being skeptical can be perceived as being rude, so many won’t do it.

Re: Evidence that collaboration results in group-think and mediocrity

#63

If this were broadly true, large science projects like the the human genome mapping, LIGO, and especially the LHC, would have little chance of success. In one of his autobiographical books, Richard Feynman has a passage in which he says that one of the best things about being at Caltech was the constant interaction with other talented people. The practice of science is much more collaborative than popular 'great men'…

science ≠ creativity
Post reply on HN