Subliminal messages have as shoddy a track record as homeopathy. At best this is a placebo effect.
Better living through subliminal messages
11–20 of 31 posts
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#12I'm sure this is too raw, to actually works.
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#13I found some MS-DOS TSR program that would flash messages on the screen at specified duration or frequency.
I told my test subjects (other students) I was testing if typing in vocabulary words helps learn them more efficiently.
I made up a set of 50 words and definitions. Each student got a random mix of words and definitions to type in, while other words were flashed on the screen subliminally.
I then gave a test which covered both sets of words.
I think I originally tested three different subliminal message durations, and one of them was showing a slightly-higher average test score.
I then realized I needed a control group, so I tested another batch of students without any subliminal messages at all. The control batch got the highest scores of all.
Don't remember details, but I did actual statistics on the data and failed to reject the Null hypothesis.
Ie - my conclusion was that flashing word/meaning subliminal messages didn't make any difference to testing those same words in a quiz.
It was a fun project, but I realized later it wasn't very scientific. The message duration would actually vary greatly depending on the model of monitor (the old CRT days). And I didn't really have control on how much time the person looked at the screen vs the keyboard.
But it was fun anyway. I was also chosen as one of eight high school kids to present at the local county science symposium too.
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#14for some people "Fokk off" is a subliminal message
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#15Reading comments, it is not as black or white as it initially looks. There is definite effect that can be observed, with say 80+% of users. I can't overstate the importance of properly phrasing messages, wrong intention or phrase can be harmful. I am always very careful when trying to help customers how to phrase something. Either way it is not all shoddy and shows results. Author of http://smartcodehq.com/subliminal…
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#16I'm extremely skeptical, but it might work for the tiny percentage of people who can be hypnotized.
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#17I'm extremely skeptical, but it might work for the tiny percentage of people who can be hypnotized.
http://blog.dilbert.com/2017/11/06/win-bigly-bonus-chapter/#...
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#18Reading comments, it is not as black or white as it initially looks. There is definite effect that can be observed, with say 80+% of users. I can't overstate the importance of properly phrasing messages, wrong intention or phrase can be harmful. I am always very careful when trying to help customers how to phrase something. Either way it is not all shoddy and shows results. Author of http://smartcodehq.com/subliminal…
“It works, I swear” says the snake oil salesman.
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#19Subliminal messages have as shoddy a track record as homeopathy. At best this is a placebo effect.
I agree that this is likely no better than placebo. I'd argue that a systematic method for _self-aware_ triggering of the placebo effect (without having to pay anybody money for it) is fundamentally valuable.
Re: Better living through subliminal messages
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
“It works, I swear” says the snake oil salesman.
All of the comments on MAS are real user comments, read a few. I don't care if you are ignorant, but ignorant and rude makes dangerous combination.