Live data from Hacker News

FCC plan would give Internet providers power to choose the sites customers see

washingtonpost.com

11–20 of 674 posts

Re: FCC plan would give Internet providers power to choose the sites customers see

#12

I love how political posts (particularly about this corrupt, incompetent administration) get flagged on HN because they're not "on topic" Well here you go, turns out politics affects real life, and even the tech industry.

Life in society and politics cannot be dissociated.

Re: FCC plan would give Internet providers power to choose the sites customers see

#14

This fight will not end until we enact legislation codifying net neutrality into law. This issue is to important for a notice to simply be overlooked in the federal register before a ruling is made.

I'm not American, so I don't know how this works, but would it not be a good idea to fight lobbying with lobbying?

Create a lobbying group, funded by a mix of regular people and businesses that push towards the ultimate aim of net neutrality being a part of national and international law.

I think a lot of people are sick of having to contact their representatives, or don't do it because it's a burden. I imagine many more people would happily throw a few dollars for someone to do that on their behalf, even if it was a recurring thing ($5 a month).

Re: FCC plan would give Internet providers power to choose the sites customers see

#17
post #12

I love how political posts (particularly about this corrupt, incompetent administration) get flagged on HN because they're not "on topic" Well here you go, turns out politics affects real life, and even the tech industry.

Life in society and politics cannot be dissociated.

And often times "not on topic" is just an excuse to silence unpopular opinions. Many people consider the things they disagree with to be "political" while the things they agree with are just common sense.

Re: FCC plan would give Internet providers power to choose the sites customers see

#18
Tweet in article:

>On December 14, the FCC will vote on Chairman Pai's plan to repeal President Obama's heavy-handed Internet regulations and restore Internet freedom.

I love how these laws are veiled with patriotic sentiments, e.g. "Internet Freedom". Just like the "Patriot Act", it is reasonable to assume anything with these sort of labels will likely be an encroachment on your freedoms.

Also

>"The job of the FCC is to represent the consumer," he said in an interview. "If you like your cable company, you'll love what this does for the Internet, because it gives Internet service providers the same kind of control over content and price as cable operators have today."

I am confident there is not a single person who "likes their cable company". Who in their right mind would want their internet controlled like their cable is controlled? This image[0] is exactly what we get to look forward to.

I have called my reps, sent emails, faxes, and just feel so helpless about all of this.

[0]: https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4252153/wh...

edit: It appears the article altered the above quote, and the second half is no longer the same.

Re: FCC plan would give Internet providers power to choose the sites customers see

#19

Tweet in article: >On December 14, the FCC will vote on Chairman Pai's plan to repeal President Obama's heavy-handed Internet regulations and restore Internet freedom. I love how these laws are veiled with patriotic sentiments, e.g. "Internet Freedom". Just like the "Patriot Act", it is reasonable to assume anything with these sort of labels will likely be an encroachment on your freedoms. Also >"The job of the FCC i…

[deleted]

Re: FCC plan would give Internet providers power to choose the sites customers see

#20
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Life in society and politics cannot be dissociated.

And often times "not on topic" is just an excuse to silence unpopular opinions. Many people consider the things they disagree with to be "political" while the things they agree with are just common sense.

In the end, especially on HN, it comes down to a discussion regarding money and who is allowed to make it and who is not. You'll find startups opposed because it hinders their opportunity to disrupt an established business, and you'll find entrenched business opposed to not making money as they see fit. There is nothing political about this discussion, it's just about money and which side of the coin you are trying to make it on.
Post reply on HN