Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course no system is completely bulletproof against a determined attacker. There are however a few differences. First of all what these people did is obviously illegal and people go to jail for doing that sort of thing. As it stands there is no legal consensus on whether exploiting a bug in a smart contract is illegal or not. Secondly and more importantly, the fail-safes built into the system largely work. In the B…
Exactly. And this is just because there are no regulations to make it illegal and standard protocols to follow that, as I've mentioned in my first post, is the key requirement if crypto economy is to be something more than just a wet dream of crypto-anarchists.
But if one of the design requirements that we want/need is that people can override any contract and roll back any transaction, what do we gain from a blockchain/crypto based solution.