Live data from Hacker News

Slaughterbots: Stop Autonomous Weapons [video]

youtube.com

131–134 of 134 posts

Re: Slaughterbots: Stop Autonomous Weapons [video]

#131
Thanks for the requirements and use case. How about a Gofundme to start on development? I also see a group providing drone attack services along the lines of booter/stresser DDoS providers (distributed denial of services).

On the other hand, I think it will be a long time before visual face recognition will ever get this good, especially out in the real world with bad lighting, hats, eyeglasses etc. But let's say the world of the video authors comes true. What do we do?

Defenses:

  1. Microwaves can fry electronics.  A system wouldn't need fancy targeting; just blast powerful microwaves in all directions.
    Downside: 
      A. Microwaves this strong are bad for people too.
      B. All it takes is 1 anti-microwave drone to slip through and disable the system.
      C. Asymmetrical cost of offense vs. defense

  2. Lasers can fry the optical sensors used by the drones
    Downside: 
      A. Probably would need a fancy targeting system?
      B. Same problems as microwave defense 1B and 1C.

  3. Something along the lines of WW2 barrage balloons.  A network of suspended lines designed to entangle the drones.
  The lines wouldn't have to be very big; a piece of strong thread could get caught in the rotor of a drone and disable it.
    Downside:
      A. Wind gusts
      B. How do you suspend the thread?
      C. Do you carry one with you when you go out to Starbucks?
      D. The thread would have to be small enough to not be detected by the drone's camera but big enough to cripple it.

  4. Ski mask.  If the drone is programmed to attack specific individuals using facial recognition, take away it's targeting requirement.
    Downside:
      A. Maybe drone deployers don't care about a specific target -- just body count.

  5. Play dead.  It's assumed the drones wouldn't waste resources on targets that have already been attacked, so just emulate a victim.
    Downside:
      A. Big assumption

  6. Wax museum defense.  Have a mannequin with target's facial features.  Drone attacks wax dummy.
    Downside:
      A. See 3C, 4A

  7. Obscure the target.  Throw a blanket over the target.
    Downside:
      A. Time to deploy.
      B. Darn.  Left my blanket in the back in the ....POP!

Re: Slaughterbots: Stop Autonomous Weapons [video]

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And we already use lasers heavily because of this. Ever noticed those square things mounted to the forends of M16 and M4 rifles in Iraq and Afghanistan? E.g. this photo from 2001 - notice how literally every guy in it has one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Marines_humping_in_A... That thing is called AN/PEQ-2, and it is an near infrared (NIR) laser/illuminator. The reason why it's infrared, is because the e…

I won't discount the other utilities of NIR night vision but for the purposes of detecting incoming infantry, it's overkill. Give me a cheap-ass webcam, a rapsberry pi 3 and a day or two to cobble together an OpenCV beam-detecting program in Python. A day or two more —perhaps with better hardware— and I'll give you GIS-aided positioning. That seems like it would be enough to defend a position. Even at other wavelengt…

The point is that the laser will likely be infrared. And it might well be of a kind that you can't easily source sensors for.

Re: Slaughterbots: Stop Autonomous Weapons [video]

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I won't discount the other utilities of NIR night vision but for the purposes of detecting incoming infantry, it's overkill. Give me a cheap-ass webcam, a rapsberry pi 3 and a day or two to cobble together an OpenCV beam-detecting program in Python. A day or two more —perhaps with better hardware— and I'll give you GIS-aided positioning. That seems like it would be enough to defend a position. Even at other wavelengt…

The point is that the laser will likely be infrared. And it might well be of a kind that you can't easily source sensors for.

Sorry, I'd switched to the side of the visible spectrum because a $2 webcam off ebay with its IR filter removed will pick up 830nm IR. That's what the AN/PEQ-2A uses.

CMOS sensors pick up all sorts.

Re: Slaughterbots: Stop Autonomous Weapons [video]

#134

It's like WWI all over again. In WWI, people went happily off to war thinking it's going to be nice and heroic and adventurous like the good old days and they all get slaughtered in a pathetic pointless way in a blink of an eye by newly developed automated war machinery. The first AI War is going to be a really brutal wakeup call. The part in sci-fi where anyone actually has to aim to kill an enemy was a big romantic…

Grunts facing mini-drones. Helmet-penetrating explosives. Military sci-fi horror.
Post reply on HN