Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

news.ycombinator.com

911–920 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#911

I don't know if this has a name, but... ICQ-like "searchable" instant messaging. Let me explain myself. In the late 90s, there was an IM client called ICQ. For starters, its UI was leaps and bounds ahead of anything to be seen in the next decade, and it had functionality like bots or groups, that has again become widespread a few years ago. But what I'm talking about is the fact that I could look for "female, age bet…

this is how I met my until now best friend about 15 years ago.

> until now

I'm sorry to hear that.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#912

I don't know if this has a name, but... ICQ-like "searchable" instant messaging. Let me explain myself. In the late 90s, there was an IM client called ICQ. For starters, its UI was leaps and bounds ahead of anything to be seen in the next decade, and it had functionality like bots or groups, that has again become widespread a few years ago. But what I'm talking about is the fact that I could look for "female, age bet…

I had some succes with Omegle. They support a feature where you can select a topic you're interested in.

> Omegle

Too many people named Dan.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#913
Bump, a technology that allowed you to match two devices (phone and/or computer) over the internet. You did this by literally bumping them together, or bumping the phone against your spacebar on a computer. A mix of geolocation, timing, and accelerometer data.

I used it a lot for file sharing, exchanging contact cards. Worked like magic, until Google bought and murdered it.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#914

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Peer-to-peer was killed by the advent of home routers doing NAT, making arbitrary inbound connections impossible. Configuring port forwarding was generally too difficult for "normal users", the web-UIs offered by typical home routers didn't make it easy enough. NAT traversal methods exist, but from my experience they are generally unreliable and/or slow. I still remember the days when P2P connections over the interne…

IIRC, consumer wifi routers supposedly support a protocol that allows a computer to request a temporary port forward and release it when its finished using it. Anyone remember what that protocol is called?

UPnP, Universal Plug and Play.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#915

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If a single CD contains (say) 10 songs, then it seems odd to compare the cost of a listening to a cd to streaming a single song. Listening to the whole CD would be the equivalent of 10 streams. And if we divide those 238 streams by the 10 songs on the CD, it seems as though we only need to listen to a cd about 25 times before streaming becomes a better option for the artist.

We "only" need to listen to a CD about 25 times? That's ~25 hours of listening to a single album.

Over a lifetime of owning a CD, that doesn't sound too crazy. I think it is a safe bet that there are albums I've listened to 25 times this year. And if I bought an album today, I would think it unlikely that I wouldn't average 2.5 plays per year over the next 10 years. I'd probably burn 10-15 of those plays in the first few weeks, and then only need 1-1.5 plays per year to break even.

Of course, I won't listen to all my albums this much. Some might only get a few plays. So I suspect that the Miles Davis estate would be better off if I streamed 'Kind of Blue' rather than owning the CD. Conversely, Creed have done relatively well from my ill-advised CD purchase because I can guarantee I'm not going to hit 25 plays on that.

So I guess the moral of the story is that I should stream from artists that I love, and buy albums from artists I am on the fence about.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#916
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thats what i meant with Apple. Android pay exists? Is it useable? Haven't seen that anywhere.

I live in London, and both Apple Pay and Android Pay are almost ubiquitous here. I recently hired a rowboat from a guy at renting them at the side of a river in the countryside - and paid with Apple Pay. Admittedly, I’ve no idea how much either are used, and how widespread they are outside London.

Nice, still hoping for it to arrive in germany.

There was one supermarket where i was able to pay with there app (it used a 4 digit code). It was quite nice to receive the digital bon per email.

It would have been easy to make automatic analysis from them but after just a few weeks, the supermarket switched brand.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#917
Mirasol display technology. I wouldn't be surprised if the display's colors simply weren't saturated enough to be marketable; but I still pine for a screen that I could actually see better under bright light instead of struggling with glare.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#918

I'm disappointed none of the various constructed "universal" languages (like Esperanto) ever took off. Having a single common language spoken by everyone would be enormously useful. As it is, the closest we have is English, but it's a natural language and therefore complicated and difficult to learn.

> Having a single common language spoken by everyone would be enormously useful

In the same way that having a single programming language would be, right? :)

Joking aside, I find having multiple languages part of the charm of being a homo sapiens. We would be missing some colour in our world if we all communicated in the same tongue and, indeed, I don't think it would solve many real-life issues around _miscommunication_.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#919
post #732

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The dream was that 3D printing would replace all manufacturing and distribution. That everyone was going to have a 3D printer in their home, and they would just be able to download patterns from the internet and get whatever they wanted, like replicators from Star Trek.

We're barely over 5 years into it. Scifi takes longer than that

That's the theme I'm seeing in a lot of the other posts: "technology X has been out for like 3 years, and it hasn't changed the world, it's a failure!"

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#920
post #631

I thought (and still think) the phone as single computing device is going to replace desktops and laptops via some kind of dock of some sort. There's been a few attempts at it by Dell and Microsoft and a few others, but none really satisfactory. I think the most successful to date is the Nintendo Switch.

I don't think the desktop is going anywhere - only the use case will shift around. Because at the time when smartphones will be able to beat today's desktops in performance, desktops will have evolved as well - it's always possible to pack more performance into a desktop case than into a smartphone case, with the technology available in any given moment.

Sure, but pretty much any modern phone can provide enough horsepower for most users, even games. The problem really comes down to the UI and IO modes.

The Switch works because it limits the options to just games. But for general purpose computing, even my slightly older Android phone can open dozens of tabs, play games, video, drive a high-res display, and so on.

If it had a dock that immediately connected it to some monitors a mouse and keyboard and the UI changed a hair I'd be a perfectly happy computing user and I get to carry around my primary device with me.

In fact, it has similar specs and a better GPU than many low-end laptops that millions of people are reasonably content to use on a daily basis.

Post reply on HN