Live data from Hacker News

Tesla Roadster

tesla.com

561–570 of 729 posts

Re: Tesla Roadster

#561
post #369

Wow, 200k for a car is pretty expensive.

The cars this model competes with are at least as expensive, if not more.

Gotta be honest here, if I would won a lottery to pick a car for 200k I would choose between Porche GT, Mercedes AMG or BMW M3 any day over this tesla.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#562

Has the 8 second quarter mile been confirmed to be done in stock trim (i.e., no special tires or other modifications)? The reason I ask is because that is EXTREMELY impressive. I tune EFI systems on race cars as a hobby, and any car in the 8 second range usually needs to run slicks or drag radials to have enough traction. Even all wheel drive cars (GTRs, DSMs, EVOs, etc.) usually run 4 slicks once they get to that sp…

I would say with 99% certainty it wasn't stock tires.

Tesla specs special tires because one of their selling points is "look how quiet EVs are and how little maintenance they need". Said special tires have increased mass over normal tires. Tesla also needs to spec something that delivers a reasonable service life under a big heavy Tesla. You can't just hand wave and say "it's a 700hp rocket, of course it eats tires" because that doesn't fit their brand image. Then there's rolling resistance. They can't spec something that has a ton of rolling resistance because it would tank range.

All of those design criteria require trade-offs from traction and each other.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#563

Has the 8 second quarter mile been confirmed to be done in stock trim (i.e., no special tires or other modifications)? The reason I ask is because that is EXTREMELY impressive. I tune EFI systems on race cars as a hobby, and any car in the 8 second range usually needs to run slicks or drag radials to have enough traction. Even all wheel drive cars (GTRs, DSMs, EVOs, etc.) usually run 4 slicks once they get to that sp…

Yep the tires... Unless this shit floats, I don't see how they could do 8 sec 1/4 mile.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#564

There has got to be an astroturfing campaign going on here, or the HN crowd is a lot more naive than I thought. Seriously, no one is concerned that Tesla is announcing, not one, but two new products, while they are failing to deliver on all three they are currently producing (in terms of production ramp-up)? What matters more than anything to Tesla is production at scale, but they are busy promising ever more fantast…

I couldn't agree more, the number of anti-Tesla comments here are staggering.

You could literally copy-paste comments from the Roaster v1, Model S, and Model X launches and relate them to the Model 3. All of those were a success, and had initial production ramp issues.

Guess what, they all ramped. I can't tell you how disappointing it is to see the HN crowd fall for the SeekingAlpha narrative.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#566
post #494

Great another car for the super wealthy. I thought Tesla's mission was to take on the GM's and Toyota's of the world. I'd personally be more excited if they announced an affordable Tesla SUV.

Oh wow, I had no idea a company Tesla's size can only focus on one thing at a time!

Meanwhile in reality they're ramping their most affordable car ever.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#567
post #52

Taking reservations for 1000 founder series cars at $250k each up front means they're pre-selling $250,000,000 worth of product at least 2 years out. Kind of smart.

I thought the same. These consumer "loans" along the way are a brilliant marketing tactics. Anyone know if this is refundable?

With the M3 all deposits were refundable.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#568
post #302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey folks. I was the one that took that video. let me know if you have any questions.

Why did you sped up the video instead of posting the original? You can see it by the movement of people around the car at the moment of acceleration.

I didn't speed up the video. That is the original.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#569

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes but in those cars traction control is usually off. In Tesla extremely precise traction control may work in your favour giving only as much power as tires can handle effectively allowing to near zero time loss on regaining tracktion. In quarter mile cars you don't have option, either tire will handle all that power or slip causing time loss.

Modern high-end aftermarket EFI systems (such as MoTeC) do have traction control, but it's not as effective as one would expect. The main issue I found is that street tires often just don't have the traction required, even under ideal conditions. The result is that traction control has to cut power so much that it ends up hurting the quarter mile times. It does help tremendously on consistency and safety though. Thin…

I suspect Tesla's advantage is in linear acceleration. Those internal combustion cars need a gearbox so the initial acceleration is very high in that first gear. This the same reason the Navy wants to go from steam to electric catapults: you get the plane to the same speed off the cat, but the acceleration curve is straight, so there's lower peak load on the airframe, so your planes last longer. Similarly, the Tesla can keep linear acceleration with gear shifts.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#570

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Founder series limited to 1000 requires full deposit, that's $250 mil Base model requires $45k deposit. Not sure what semi requirements are. Even if they are biting off more than they can chew, they can gauge reaction and devote more/less to this. I'm thinking that these ventures give their engineers a space to get really creative and push the envelope. And, these advancements make their way into the mainstream model…

What's even more amazing is that F or GM couldn't possibly do this. First mover advantage plus the allure of someone like Musk is what is needed. I know many bash him for spreading himself too thin among all his other ambitions but it gives him good will capital (which can translate to economic capital) when needed.

Ford and GM can absolutely do this. Tesla is "hot", but Ford is successful.

People underestimating the big players and cars aren't thinking about the economics right. Ford markets are almost two orders of magnitude more than Tesla is producing. If Ford sees the global opportunity to sell 10-20 million EVs a year they'll build the crap out of them.

Post reply on HN