Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

news.ycombinator.com

681–690 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#681

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I met my wife on ICQ after using the same search method you described. :)

Met my first love but didn't get married. Congratulations!

Same. First love and first heartbreak. She took awhile to get over. I ended up sabotaging quite a few opportunities with women I had during my freshman year of college because I still wasn't really over her.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#682
post #479

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yes, but the English spoken by most non-natives is actually something like an Esperanto. the pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar is almost normalized and an artificial dialect. i think English is a very good compromise. the only problem are French people and other communities who disdain English for patriotical, historical, or political reasons.

And it's called "airport english"

I always thought Wolf Blitzer was "airport english"

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#684

E-Ink. It is the "correct" choice for display technology, and with enough research money put into it, it could replace these abominable light-emitting displays. But what we already have is "good enough", despite all of the hidden costs, and so we're stuck with it.

I love E-Ink display. Fell in love with it when I bought my first Kindle. I could read all day and my eyes won't be tired at all.

Since then I had been waiting for E-Ink based laptop for work. It doesn't need to play videos or even display color. As a backend developer, I can live with grey scale display. It doesn't need high refresh rates either.

But now almost 10 years later, it doesn't look like this will ever happen.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#685
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup, it hasn't gone away or stopped growing. It might be taking too long for journalists to find interest in it right now, but that has low correlation to the research effort.

mind explaining a little more in terms of how far away we might be able to mass produce these things?

http://www.molecularassembler.com/Nanofactory/

(Science is legit, but needs a better website.)

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#686
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uh oh, I think I'm about to rant. Scuse me. Given how cheap even powerful general purpose computers are I don't think they ever will be prized beyond availability. Aficionados, internet stores, arm, Linux, market forces, etc. To some part, good riddance. Software engineers and product designers are the reason the PC is effectively broken by design in UX. Because they are inexcusably slow. There is 0 reason anything I…

> My friggin circa 1984 Mac Plus felt faster on most stuff than the generic desktop PC See how fast it felt. https://youtu.be/XwbrCYJcrKQ?t=4m34s No way and NO HOW! That statement is 100% false. The issue is you remember that it felt fast. My Amiga felt like lightening to me in 1985 and I still boot it up from time to time. The delays in everything is over the top and Mac 128k were horribly slow.

I meant the Macintosh Plus, not the Macintosh 128k. I was off by a few years, the Mac Plus came in 1986.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_128K

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_Plus

I think the example is a bit too sluggish but is probably a more correct presentation of the actual facts than my nostalgic outburst.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#687

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you say a thousand years ago presumably you mean the pre-French Norman language mixed with the Old English from 1066? I'd go back to the Roman invasion, at least, and the mixing of Latin as the official language of Roman Britain with the Brytthonic language(s) [themselves already probably mixing with other earlier Celtic tongues]. Some of the Latin in English (and Cymraeg) was adopted via the Norman/French tongu…

As a French, I've always enjoyed finding words in English coming from French, but I've never though about latin words coming from the roman occupation. Thank you for sharing!

Words like ffenestr and ysgol from Cymraeg show the adoption of Latin that you'd recognise in French (fenetre, ecole). Suggesting these words were already around in Old English from Latin.

It can be hard to tell the history though, eg sovereign came from French (rein) but got Latinised (regnare) in spelling reform.

One interesting thing for me was finding English loanwords in Cymraeg (former Welsh language) that are no longer used in English. I'll bet there are some French loanwords in English that aren't in French any more?

There are words adopted twice too, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_of_Fre... has lots of examples. Giving us chief and chef in English with different meanings but based on a single French word (I gather) adopted at different times.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#688

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OK, I only ask for 10% of the profits for giving you the idea :) Just kidding. I would definitely support such a crowdfunding within my modest means. The problem is that I don't think the tech is the main issue (after all, ICQ did it with 90s tehc). Obtaining an userbase is the main issue, and network effects go against new contenders.

Not to mention.. dick picks.

That's actually a good point in the sense that when ICQ was popular most people didn't have a digital camera in their pocket with instant upload capability so sending a dick pic would have been way more trouble.

Maybe the fact that pretty much everyone has a digital camera in their pocket now means the world has changed into a world where ICQ as the OP described it just can't exist anymore

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#689

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bitcoin.

I knew about Bitcoin quite early, but I was convinced the government would shut it down. I am mystified as to why they didn't.

The government can't just "shut down" whatever it wants in a society like the US with (relatively) strong rule of law.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#690

GWT. To create client-side web apps, rather than writing Javascript, write Java and have it transpiled to Javascript. Java has IDEs, isn't a new language to learn (like Dart), has static type checking, support for refactoring in the IDEs, etc. GWT could do tree shaking, obfuscation, etc. You could write your server code in Java, and "call" remote server methods from your client code, "passing" Java objects transparen…

This came up a few weeks ago, and someone from google chimed in saying google just recently release new apps usin gwt, and it's still active. But I share your view that it was a failed technology. All the gwt I see in my area is legacy. I remember prototyping a project with it and being flummoxed by the ui not laying out the way it ought to have. From that experience, I never used it again.
Post reply on HN