Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

news.ycombinator.com

331–340 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#331

Plan 9 from Bell Labs

I was a user from 2000. The first question new users would ask was "where's the web browser". You basically had to run two computers, one with Linux/Windows and one Plan9.

The next question was "what are the keyboard shortcuts" and the answer was "escape toggles text entry in the shell, research says using the mouse is quicker".

It was a hard sell.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#333

The converse is possibly even more interesting: what tech were you convinced would fail but took the world by storm?

Bitcoin.

Same here. In the early days, the price was driven by emotion. Every time there was a problem, everyone sold and the price went to the floor.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#335

erlang. As a programmer it was a revelatory thing of beauty. When we tried to spread it within our org we found that the 'typical' (even relatively strong) programmer resisted its concepts and found it hard to learn. Therefore it didn't scale for us.

How very odd. That's one language I found intuitive.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#336

Optical computing. I remember talking to a bloke working on it back in 1990, and he said they had a working optical transistor so all the hard bits were done. Soon we'd have computers that used multiple frequencies of light to process operations concurrently on the same hardware! Still waiting...

He's right! There are transistors which have light at different frequencies on the same hardware. This paper[1] talks about how they've achieved 1.125 Tb/s throughput with various techniques.

So he's right about optical computing, but just not in the way you anticipated :)

Just extremely fixed functions with mind-blowing capacity.

[1]: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep21278

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#337

E-Ink. It is the "correct" choice for display technology, and with enough research money put into it, it could replace these abominable light-emitting displays. But what we already have is "good enough", despite all of the hidden costs, and so we're stuck with it.

I think it was one of the technologies that are actually hard. So they got where we are with low/medium effort and expenses but unwilling to go further because they can't or don't have money. I suspect color eink tanked because of this.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#338
VR glasses / headsets

I remember when I tried the first headset sometime between 1999 and 2002. I thought "This will be big". 15 years later it's still not big.

Tablets

I expected tablets to become omnipresent. But phones took that spot instead.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#339

Mobile/Micro payments. There is still no friction free solution, where I would be sure, my mother could use it.

This problem is solved in China. Blame your local incumbents.

Could you give more info please?
Post reply on HN