Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

news.ycombinator.com

211–220 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#211
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I bought my NFC Phone 3,9 Years ago, never used it. Apple is now doing something with it and it might come but it should have taken of way earlier. Right now i have already a contact less credit card and that works like a charm.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t Apple Pay and Android Pay already use NFC?

Thats what i meant with Apple. Android pay exists? Is it useable? Haven't seen that anywhere.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#212
post #102
post #39

The general-purpose computer. It's a dinosaur on the verge of extinction at the hands of walled-garden app stores on phones and tablets. I never, ever expected that to happen.

Uh oh, I think I'm about to rant. Scuse me. Given how cheap even powerful general purpose computers are I don't think they ever will be prized beyond availability. Aficionados, internet stores, arm, Linux, market forces, etc. To some part, good riddance. Software engineers and product designers are the reason the PC is effectively broken by design in UX. Because they are inexcusably slow. There is 0 reason anything I…

> The decade when Moores law gave freebies to software is probably one of the reasons for this astronomical sluggishness. Application feels slow? Well, just wait a year and get a new faster CPU. No need to spend resources on optimization.

I'd like to see a word 1.0 coded with current tech stacks. Same functionalities. And see how fast it feels.

I think this feeling is a combination of a lot of things taken for granted and nostalgia.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#213
post #103
post #39

The general-purpose computer. It's a dinosaur on the verge of extinction at the hands of walled-garden app stores on phones and tablets. I never, ever expected that to happen.

This really destroyed my day. I really have a big problem staying positive for at least a day now that you've eloquently expressed what I've had a creeping feeling of but just quite couldn't word in any discussion. As computers become "locked app collections" they become appliances, appliances business and government institutions can control and regulate. "Can you make the iPad just not do that thing?"

Sorry :(

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#214

Mobile/Micro payments. There is still no friction free solution, where I would be sure, my mother could use it.

i think venmo's done a great job of it in the US and in China the micropayments have done much better. I think its in progress, just definitely not a "revolution" maybe because it doesnt fix a real pain point for people

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#215

The converse is possibly even more interesting: what tech were you convinced would fail but took the world by storm?

Uber. It's a "taxi service except about half the price because it starts over with no unions". If it's so profitable, why didn't other taxi services do it instead? Is the whole reason because it lowers the bar for taxi drivers to be hired, thus reaching those who would be fine with the lower pay?

> If it's so profitable, why didn't other taxi services do it instead?

Because that was illegal. This isn't a secret - it's constantly mentioned by pro-Uber and con-Uber groups.

Reimagine it as "it's half the price because it is not the beneficiary of a government-granted monopoly on its business".

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#216

WebTV

Well didn't it? Considering Youtube and Netflix... Or is that some specific technology that I don't know about?

No, it hasn't. Still, the majority of TV viewers use TV utility providers, not ISPs. When the average couch dweller sits down, grabs a remote, and turns on Netflix instead of "channel 42" on cable TV, WebTV will be commonplace, but it won't happen until the young Netflix-watching generation completely replaces the older cable-watching generation.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Curious, aren't phones and tablets essentially just smaller personal computers?

As kobeya points out https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15719171 they are not the same thing they do less; the software is restricted, especially on iOS, there are _rules_ set out by the manufacturer about what is acceptable in software on the platform, both thematically and functionally. An app generally can't interfere with other apps, it can't be a dope wars style game about drugs; there are a lot more caveats,…

ok i expected HN to have the pmarca thesis in mind - aren't phone browsers still open software? am i being too idealistic?

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

snapchat's biggest problem is the interface, it's extremely hard to use. I think the plan was to make it complicated so that older people don't get into it, turns out nobody wants to struggle using a selfie app

> turns out nobody wants to struggle using a selfie app Tons of people use the app. The interface is central to its virality. Snap's growth wasn't a problem until Facebook did everything they could to clone it. Snaps failing because everyone is starting to realize that if you aren't GOOG or FB, you aren't worth spending $$$ on. Just the other day I saw an "OfferUp" ad on Snap that looked like a 90s banner ad. I can't…

IMHO even if facebook cloned all the functionality, if people found snapchat easier to use they wouldn't have jumped ship the moment it became an option.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#219
post #95

I thought this was going to be 'The VR Thread.' I still don't entirely understand why virtual reality didn't really catch on. I think there were some very poor business decisions by Facebook which were treating it as a success before it had even launched -- trying to ring-fence a platform, both hardware and software, whose early demographic is going to be entirely high information users seems a very questionable deci…

Spend 10 minutes with an HTC Vibe or an Oculus Rift on your head, and you'll be impressed. Now spend 4 hours. Most of those things end up in closets. Or on eBay.

I like this way of thinking. It explains a load of products and technologies.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#220

Kinect - such a human interface that doesn't require direct integration with hardware or technical knowledge or buttons, and a lot of fun in the games I played. But it failed.

i'm still shocked that Microsoft decided to discontinue that.. there was so much great research being done on the back of that little device.
Post reply on HN