Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

news.ycombinator.com

111–120 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#111

I am still waiting for all my favourite applications to be extendable in GNU Guile. On a more general note, I am still waiting for the world to fall for lisp in general.

> On a more general note, I am still waiting for the world to fall for lisp in general.

Gah, aren't we all? Watching John Carmack push Scheme for the Oculus Rift 2 [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydyztGZnbNs] made me feel like something was right in the universe.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#112
post #39

The general-purpose computer. It's a dinosaur on the verge of extinction at the hands of walled-garden app stores on phones and tablets. I never, ever expected that to happen.

Did people really think the arms race of heuristic malware detection in bolt-on security software would be be sustainable?

Sandboxing applications and ending the free-for-all over the user’s entire file system were a long time coming. Then spammy software download websites and “Download Now” banner ads bigger than the official download buttons for popular software made it obvious that we needed a trustworthy distribution center. Of course someone starting an OS in the mid 2000s wasn’t going to adopt the Windows shareware distribution model.

The Linux distribution model of a vetted, quality controlled repository of software from a trusted middleman was so obviously superior, of course it won. I guess it’s surprising that iOS got so far with no escape hatch, but Android is the far more popular platform and has always let more technical users peek over the walls if they so desire.

I’m more surprised that so many people are content to type on glass. I was sure that the blackberry keyboard was the future.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#113
Mobile Augmented Reality or ARKit, But it was just hype as previous. I mean nothing in mainstream.

I think main reason is UX or User Interface. It is very hard for people who do not know how it works and expect it to work perfect (in low light etc) as with normal user interface of smartphone. It was not very intuitive for normal user because of Smartphone limitations.

I can think that it might take in future if they improve the correctness of platform. It have lot of potential and let's see what future brings.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#115

I'm not sure I expected it to take the world "by storm", but I expected more from Google Wave. It was a great concept, by a major company, but it was too slow on release and the rollout killed it. In retrospect, it probably wouldn't have lasted anyways. Google was in the process of minimizing their federated communication services by that point, and that was another major selling point of Google Wave's initial propos…

Internally in Google it was really, really hard to get in the Wave team. So many people felt the opportunity to show what they can and get a career boost. So, presumably, they had best Google engineers working on that product.

What I want to say is an obvious thing -- stellar team doesn't imply success.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#119

E-Ink. It is the "correct" choice for display technology, and with enough research money put into it, it could replace these abominable light-emitting displays. But what we already have is "good enough", despite all of the hidden costs, and so we're stuck with it.

Have you ever played gameboy as a kid?

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#120
Quantum computers. I thought so until i spent some time looking at superposition&entanglement and got convinced that there is no superposition&entanglement. Looking at the published Bell inequality experiments i see exactly opposite of what whose experiments supposedly confirm :/
Post reply on HN