Earlier quoted context omitted.
I gave Firefox a try a month or two ago when people started saying it was good again. I think I had a problem with uBlock origin not working well enough - too much crap was getting through. What are people using for adblock?
uBlock origin with uMatrix
How Firefox Got Fast Again
641–650 of 713 posts
Re: How Firefox Got Fast Again
#642Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean by that? If your use case is not covered, you surely can write a WebExtension to provide the functionality. Containers as well as sync are exposed in the API.
I just wanted to know if the containers will be automatically synced across devices.
Container settings (names, colors, icons, assignments) should be synced (if not, please file a bug). Open tabs will be synced, not sure how they will open on another machine (considering URL-to-Container assignments should be synced, they should open in the respective containers – maybe there's a possible improvement here).
I expect the different Cookie stores to be synced as well, if not, that's a bug.
Re: How Firefox Got Fast Again
#643Earlier quoted context omitted.
> don't track your entire web browsing history Entire or not, does Google analytics apply here?
Yeah, I think this is where things start to get fairly pointless with avoiding being tracked. I'm imagining that even at a basic level they can match up any Google searches / GMail you use to your IP address and then follow that via Google Analytics. I'm happily using DDG as a replacemet for most Google searches. But I guess I need to stop using GMail.
Re: How Firefox Got Fast Again
#644I think this might be the turning point to ditch Chrome & its parent.
Re: How Firefox Got Fast Again
#645Earlier quoted context omitted.
... ... What do you mean?
There are two distinct problems I've noticed with FF scrolling vs. Chrome on Android. First is that certain elements block scrolling. I use FF primarily for Facebook (since FF allows me to use my – shameless plug – idle-time faker extension [1]). If my scrolling thumb lands on the "Like" button of a post, the screen just stays put. So about 1/3 of my "scroll" gestures are in vain. Second is that "flinging" motions do…
Re: How Firefox Got Fast Again
#646I was really excited for Quantum, but it appears the switch to WebExtensions is going to gut most of my favourite addons, and completely kill the rest. About half of the addons I use have been updated to be compatible with Firefox 57, so the rest will stop working as soon as I update. Of the ones that have updated, most are missing significant features. The most significant example is Lastpass, which can no longer fi…
Too bad Mozilla changed the Add-On website a few days ago. You don't see any indication of supported Firefox version anymore. You only see the extensions that work in your current browser, not the extensions for the next version. (Unless you switch to the old layout in an link hidden in the footer.)
Some extensions will be delayed because the deadline (2 years?) wasn't long enough. Some extensions need additional features and may only be available with Firefox 58 or later. Some never.
And you need to invest some time to research this. One starting point is https://arewewebextensionsyet.com/
Re: How Firefox Got Fast Again
#647I hope it will not take too long until FF gets hardware acceleration for videos on Linux (VAAPI/VDPAU). A few days ago I installed Arch Linux on a Netbook and was shocked to see that FF still doesn't have hardware acceleration for videos (VDPAU exists since 2008). Some might say this is not much of an issue as most modern CPUs can handle 1080p, but actually pre-Ryzen AMD CPUs are too slow and power saving Intel CPUs…
The main problem is that in order to have a benefit from decoding in the GPU, the frame needs to be displayed on the GPU without reading it into CPU-addressable memory.
The video frame needs to participate in the compositing of the whole Web page, which means the simpler approaches that video player-only apps can used aren't really available. Rather, it's necessary to be able to treat the video frame as some kind of OpenGL surface.
However, the Linux graphics drivers situation being as messy as it is, Firefox doesn't yet enable OpenGL compositing by default on Linux.
So getting Firefox to composite the Web page using OpenGL by default on Linux is the big prerequisite.
I don't work on graphics, so I don't really know what I'm talking about in this sentence, but I'm hopeful that Wayland will eventually force Linux into the Mac-like situation where some baseline of OpenGL support can be assumed to be available and working just because the windowing system wouldn't work otherwise.
Sadly, due to LTS distros, it will take a while for various legacy configurations to get upgraded out of the ecosystem.
Re: How Firefox Got Fast Again
#648Earlier quoted context omitted.
Use FF nightly on Android. It's got the quantum update and it's great. I haven't had it break on me yet, but I keep a working APK just in case.
Has it actually got Quantum DOM as well? I was under the impression that it was merely Electrolysis and Quantum Compositor (i.e. the speedups from Firefox 54), and that the massive on from 57 was still set to arrive?
Re: How Firefox Got Fast Again
#649I hope it will not take too long until FF gets hardware acceleration for videos on Linux (VAAPI/VDPAU). A few days ago I installed Arch Linux on a Netbook and was shocked to see that FF still doesn't have hardware acceleration for videos (VDPAU exists since 2008). Some might say this is not much of an issue as most modern CPUs can handle 1080p, but actually pre-Ryzen AMD CPUs are too slow and power saving Intel CPUs…
I keep trying Firefox versions every now and then, including 57, but always run into obstacles. After installing 57, I went to Twitch and saw my cpu spike and MacBook drastically heat up. So it’s not just Linux. I hope more Quantum/Servo stuff will solve all these issues soon. I just want to ditch Google as much as I can. Now trying Safari for casual browsing, and using Chrome just for dev stuff.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1403823
Poor battery life on OSX