Live data from Hacker News

Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

cnbc.com

51–60 of 297 posts

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Degree requirements are the last bastion of socially acceptable racism.

How is a degree requirement racist?

"The 6-year national college graduation rate is 59% for White students, 51% for Hispanic students, 46% for Black females, and 35% for Black males."[1]

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_achievement_gap_in_the_...

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#52

I sometimes think, with deep regret, that most people living at or below the poverty line at 30, their chances of rising above that are quite low. At 40+ it's next to zero. This may also be very generous. The amount of education, training, and opportunities would have to line up perfectly for someone to pull themselves up. Multigenerational, the odds appear much better.

Upward mobility is a lie. There are tons of studies and books on this - Thomas Piketty might be one.

That’s a pretty absurd thing to say so matter of factly. 62% of US billionaires are self made [1].

Many of us tech workers have experienced incredible upward mobility.

1. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/269593

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#53
post #21

Trade apprenticeship + cultivated curiosity in tech = exactly what hold industries need. Unfortunately, old industries tend toward new "talent" + degree in something cool sounding in hopes of disruptive "yahtzee". they, or at least mine, largely ignore the ones who know the business rules/needs the most in gavor of who "should know the future best". Oops.

What’s “new” of today is the legacy codebases of tomorrow!

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#54

I sometimes think, with deep regret, that most people living at or below the poverty line at 30, their chances of rising above that are quite low. At 40+ it's next to zero. This may also be very generous. The amount of education, training, and opportunities would have to line up perfectly for someone to pull themselves up. Multigenerational, the odds appear much better.

Upward mobility is a lie. There are tons of studies and books on this - Thomas Piketty might be one.

There are also tons of studies and books that say it's not, and Piketty is hotly contested by many scholars.

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#55

Isn't Germany, one of the more booming economies of Europe, a place that promotes the trades and provides educational tracks for interested students to easily get into apprenticeship programs? And where there isn't stigma against entering such a field?

> And where there isn't stigma against entering such a field? This isn’t true. Germany is the second most credentialist, title obsessed country in the world, with a class structure as obvious as in the UK, if different.

As an amusing factoid, Germany is the country where my spouse would be addressed as "Frau Doktor Doktor."

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#56
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is a degree requirement racist?

"The 6-year national college graduation rate is 59% for White students, 51% for Hispanic students, 46% for Black females, and 35% for Black males."[1] 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_achievement_gap_in_the_...

There are racial differences with pretty much everything in the US. Are benefits for poor people racist because they disproportionally help black people? Is having a required entrance average for universities racist because black people have statistically lower grades/graduation rates? Sure, if you are choosing to filter applicants based on criteria where the only effect of the filtering is changing the racial distribution, it may be racist, but that certainly isn't the case when you are filtering based on whether or not a person has a degree.

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#58
> "There are too many four-year colleges serving too many students,

The Screwing of the Average Man [0] said that college used to be something the upper-class sent their children to so they'd have a leg up on the "uneducated" masses. Then the congress provided the GI Bill to subsidize college for WWII veterans. This kept disgruntled veterans occupied while the economy retooled to peacetime production. Thus began the college price spiral.

My great-grandmother played prohibition well, and sent all 4 of her children to teh college during the great depression. After WWII, the one grandfather didn't need any more college degrees and used the GI Bill to learn to fly small planes. My other grandfather had no interest in any college, so he didn't utilize his tuition credits... He certainly would've done better financially if he had...

[0] https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0553129139

The only class I enjoyed in my public school experience was my 8th grade "technology" class. This semester was broken up into woodshop, welding/metal working, "computers", photography, and (don't remember). 45 minutes of appreciated learnings, 5 days a week, for one semester. Everything else was busy work. I learned a few things, here and there, but not enough to justify the countless hours of boredom.

College was kind of a scam. I have an expensive diploma that doesn't mean anything. I learned a few things, here and there, but not enough to justify the $100k+ spent on my behalf.

John Gatto [1] says it's better to skip as much of the early years of schooling as possible: some children learn to read when they're 2, some when they're 8, and by the time they're 12 you can't tell the difference. I met a man a few months ago that was traumatized by not being able to "read" on the teacher's schedule when he was in 1st grade. He learned to read eventually, in spite of his school's efforts to force him to read before he was ready.

Allowing young children to have experiences in the real world instead of more classroom time would be much more valuable than giving young adults a choice of a trade school vs. more academics at age 18.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14425760

edit: clarification

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Upward mobility is a lie. There are tons of studies and books on this - Thomas Piketty might be one.

That’s a pretty absurd thing to say so matter of factly. 62% of US billionaires are self made [1]. Many of us tech workers have experienced incredible upward mobility. 1. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/269593

What percentage of self-made billionaires started out as millionaires?

what percentage of poor people become self-made billionaires?

What percentage of poor people who become self-made billionaires do so by going to trade school?

Re: Trade school, not 4-year college, is a better bet to solve the US income gap

#60

Another idea, indirectly related, is to simply stop treating all university degrees equally. The whole reason student loans are so broken right now is because they cannot be dismissed, so lenders are incentivized to lend with reckless abandon. In the worst case scenario the loan converts into a lifetime rent on an individual that automatically adjusts for inflation. On the other hand, the idea behind creating special…

In my view, this idea runs the danger of creating a planned economy, with characteristic boom-bust cycles and scams.

The choice of which degrees to fund has to be made on either past data or some sort of current fad. The list of preferred degrees will of course create competition to get into those programs, but it may also encourage colleges to create watered-down or even fake disciplines that can absorb more students.

Hypothetical example: Assuming that computer science is on the "hot list," a low-tier college creates a fluff degree in Computer Technology Studies, that gains access to loan money but leads to marginal employment prospects.

Closer to home, the K-12 schools in my locale have a new program that creates career tracks at the high school level. The first track that has become available is health care. Granted, it sounds like a good idea, what can possibly go wrong?

Post reply on HN