Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even before it's demise, a lot of content publishers were only publishing headlines and abstracts via RSS, with the intent to drive clicks to hosted articles. The inability to publish ads inline RSS ultimately killed it. If and when the news bundling model re-emerges, something like RSS will gain favor again.
> The inability to publish ads inline RSS ultimately killed it. Huh? There's no such inability.
RSS: there's nothing better
71–80 of 295 posts
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#72so whats a good rss reader in 2017?
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#73so whats a good rss reader in 2017?
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#74I've been seriously considering trying to consume the web solely by RSS again. All the news sites, the few twitter accounts I actually care about, HN. HN still provides RSS, and there are ways to get it for sites that don't support it, e.g. Twitter. Everything seems to be gearing more towards deliberately occupying as much of my time as possible, algorithmically selecting content that achieves this. I want out of thi…
As an ex RSS addict I'm wondering why you think you can fix things by using RSS feeds. For me it actually takes more of my time.
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#75Lo and behold, opened a gmail account specifically for newsletters, subscribed to my swift, kotlin, design, UX and AI newsletters and I'm now using Apple Mail to have the time of my life consuming all the content I need, delivered to my inbox daily, with no spam, no friends, no follow, no ads, no nothing.
Of course there is still the possibility to provide a nice client rich in features for the common user so the idea for a startup is still in the air.
RSS is dead, long live newsletters.
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#76Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#77so whats a good rss reader in 2017?
"Feedbro" PlugIn in Firefox. For me, the browser is the natural environment for RSS reading. "Sage" did a perfect job for me in the past, but since it is not available for FF 57 yet, I switched to "Feedbro" and never regretted.
Now if I could only get Feedbro to sync my read items...
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#78Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#79I've been seriously considering trying to consume the web solely by RSS again. All the news sites, the few twitter accounts I actually care about, HN. HN still provides RSS, and there are ways to get it for sites that don't support it, e.g. Twitter. Everything seems to be gearing more towards deliberately occupying as much of my time as possible, algorithmically selecting content that achieves this. I want out of thi…
TBH, it's a bit like this now for me with HN and Twitter even without RSS. "This looks interesting... (click)(open in new tab)". One week later: 300 tabs open.
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#80edit: I mean how users, not article authors, keep and organize full articles.