Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, that would have been Lord Haw Haw and Ezra Pound who made propaganda broadcasts for the fascists. It wasn't as though Wodehouse had shaken hands with Hitler. He merely talked about what his internment was like, and he only made about five broadcasts. Even so, I think he was incredibly naïve of him to do this, given that by 1940, the Germans hadn't simply crossed the line into uncivilized conduct, they had gleeful…
Ah, you're saying he's a Hanoi Jane. I did not realize that about Ezra Pound. Now I see why people like GK Chesterton and CS Lewis disliked TS Elliot (protege of Pound) so much.
Some Heroes
71–80 of 109 posts
Re: Some Heroes
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, you're saying he's a Hanoi Jane. I did not realize that about Ezra Pound. Now I see why people like GK Chesterton and CS Lewis disliked TS Elliot (protege of Pound) so much.
No, I didn't say that at all.
However, I just read pg's link and now understand what you were saying.
Re: Some Heroes
#73What he did in the 60 aka punchcard times in one demo revolutionizing the computer: http://sloan.stanford.edu/mousesite/1968Demo.html
For the first time real time connection to a computer using a monitor. Introducing the concept of files, documents, ... Primitive graphical UI. Video conferencing between Menlo Park and Fort Mason in San Francisco. That was done wirelessly by parking transmitter trucks on skyline ...
When he was young he set the principle for his life:
Let me design a professional goal which will maximize the contribution my career can have to mankind!
Weeks later his lifetime goal emerged: As much as possible, to boost mankind's collective capability for coping with complex, urgent problems.
He is in his 90s and still at it: http://www.futuresalon.org/2004/11/future_salon_do.htmlTruly amazing, Mark.
Re: Some Heroes
#74Newton was a “glandeur”; In Dijksterhuis 2004:
George Spencer Brown has famously said about Sir Isaac Newton that “to arrive at the simplest truth, as Newton knew and practiced, requires years of contemplation. Not activity. Not reasoning. Not calculating. Not busy behavior of any kind. Not reading. Not talking. Not making an effort. Not thinking. Simply bearing in mind what it is that one needs to know.”
Written by Nassim Nicholas Taleb: "Glander best describes the notion of lifting all inhibitions to “tinker intellectually in an undirected stochastic process aiming at capturing some idea that will enrich your corpus”. “Researching” or “thinking” smack of a top-down activity."
More on Glander by Taleb: "It is an irony that the academy does not have a word for the process by which discovery works best –but slang does. I was trying to describe in a letter what I am currently doing: French would not let me. But argot lends itself very well... I am involved in an activity called “Glander”, more precisely “glandouiller”. It means “to idle”, though not “to be in a state of idleness” (it is an active verb). Gandouiller denotes enjoyment. The formal French word is “ne rien faire” (to do nothing), which misses on the active part –so do words that have a languishing connotation. Glander is what children without soccer moms do when they are out of school. It resembles flâner which has this perambulation part; though Glander does not have any strings attached. The Italians have farniente but it is really doing nothing. Even the Arabs do not have a verb for Glander: the construction takaslana from the Semitic root ksl denotes laziness (other words imply some inertia)."
[Taken from http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/notebook.htm]
Re: Some Heroes
#75Also worth noting that a Calder sculpture is on the cover of a common Algorithms book: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41WDWECWVCL._SS500_.jp...
Most of the mobiles are literally recursive. I spent a couple days trying to reproduce them once, and one thing you learn when you do that is that each subelement is a complete mobile in itself. In fact I suspect he must often have incorporated "finished" mobiles into larger ones later.
His big one in the East Wing of the National Gallery is outstanding. They blow the HVAC on it to make it move. IM Pei requested that it be the centerpiece of his great building. IM Pei, another possible hero. Fun essay.
Re: Some Heroes
#76One of my heroes: O Sensei, Morihei Ueshiba. He definitely cared excessively about his "work", and was absolutely honest. He invented aikido, the "art of peace", whose broad purpose is to "make human beings one family." Here's a decent video of him: http://youtube.com/watch?v=0XTlWDOQBno&feature=related
Re: Some Heroes
#77> To do really great things, you have to seek out questions people didn't even realize were questions. ... You only get one life. Why not do something huge? This one really got me thinking. While tackling big questions is certainly admirable, it implies that greatness ought to be a goal one has in life. As I get older (I'm now married with 2 kids), I've become more and more convinced that it's more important in life…
Re: Some Heroes
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ugh. Monroeville. Come for the Sam's Club. Stay for the Popeye's.
Yeah, the place was a kind of worst-case scenario for strip development. In my time the big draw was Monroeville Mall, the biggest in the country at the time of its construction ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroeville_Mall ). The one good part, for a kid, was that a lot of the land was too hilly to build on, and was left as forest.
Re: Some Heroes
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, the place was a kind of worst-case scenario for strip development. In my time the big draw was Monroeville Mall, the biggest in the country at the time of its construction ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroeville_Mall ). The one good part, for a kid, was that a lot of the land was too hilly to build on, and was left as forest.
Things haven't changed much. I grew up in Trafford (it's not often I can expect someone to know where that is) and inevitably find myself at Monroeville Mall every year during the holidays.
Re: Some Heroes
#80I was hoping to see Feynman on this list (especially after reading the two qualities that these people had in common). Good read, though.
I almost included him. But I don't understand his work in physics, and it seemed lame to like him for peripheral stuff like his autobiography.