21–30 of 253 posts
Considering the history of spoofed messages aimed at manipulating the market, they should have cryptographically signed the message That said - if this is true, they've done the difficult but right thing.
Looks like it is still on to me.
Considering the history of spoofed messages aimed at manipulating the market, they should have cryptographically signed the message That said - if this is true, they've done the difficult but right thing.
This guy is saying he has confirmed it with Mike, one of the signers of the email. https://twitter.com/lopp/status/928310251719405568
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which way would spoofing this message send the market?
Some people were waiting for the "free money" to come so they could buy "alt coins". Some will be happy to see BTC unchallenged. Price will be a balance of both.
Considering the history of spoofed messages aimed at manipulating the market, they should have cryptographically signed the message That said - if this is true, they've done the difficult but right thing.
This guy is saying he has confirmed it with Mike, one of the signers of the email. https://twitter.com/lopp/status/928310251719405568
Wow! Site is down, can someone copy the text over here?
The Segwit2x effort began in May with a simple purpose: to increase the blocksize and improve Bitcoin scalability. At the time, the Bitcoin community was in crisis after nearly 3 years of heavy debate, and consensus for Segwit seemed like a distant mirage with only 30% support among miners. Segwit2x found its first success in August, as it broke the deadlock and quickly led to Segwit’s successful activation. Since th…
So... this should probably mean a deep dive for btc price then, right?
So... this should probably mean a deep dive for btc price then, right?
Considering the history of spoofed messages aimed at manipulating the market, they should have cryptographically signed the message That said - if this is true, they've done the difficult but right thing.
This is because it is more important what is in the message than who wrote it.