Live data from Hacker News

IBM Type

ibm.github.io

31–40 of 130 posts

Re: IBM Type

#31
post #11

What's the license? Is this purely an internal IBM font?

https://github.com/IBM/type/blob/master/LICENSE.md > Copyright © 2017 IBM Corp. with Reserved Font Name "Plex" > This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1.

Wow, at least they included a license this time. I desperately tried years ago to get the license for the fonts shipped with the Symphony Suite, but in vain. No files, no declaration in the fonts, no answer from the IBM support.

Re: IBM Type

#32
post #21

Great page, it only took 13s to load. With no wonder when it takes 13.8 MB. And the biggest png files are not even pngcrushed... du -ch editorial-1.png editorial-3.png product-1.png product- 2.png product-3.png product-4.png 2,5M editorial-1.png 832K editorial-3.png 368K product-1.png 288K product-2.png 284K product-3.png 1,2M product-4.png 5,4M total vs pngcrushed: du -ch editorial-1.smaller.png editorial-3.smaller.…

It also looked messed up on mobile - the nav bar took up 20% of the screen. Definitely a point in favour of the motherfuckingwebsite.com school of thought.

Re: IBM Type

#33
It's a licensed font from Blue Monday. No cyrillic, no greek, not to mention polytonic greek. And they took the true small caps out of the fonts ...

MISC FIXED forever!

Re: IBM Type

#34
post #21

Great page, it only took 13s to load. With no wonder when it takes 13.8 MB. And the biggest png files are not even pngcrushed... du -ch editorial-1.png editorial-3.png product-1.png product- 2.png product-3.png product-4.png 2,5M editorial-1.png 832K editorial-3.png 368K product-1.png 288K product-2.png 284K product-3.png 1,2M product-4.png 5,4M total vs pngcrushed: du -ch editorial-1.smaller.png editorial-3.smaller.…

I just heard of pngcrush for the first time. I usually use optipng. Any insight which is better?

I used to hear good things about Ken Silverman's PNGOUT but not recently.

Re: IBM Type

#35
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just heard of pngcrush for the first time. I usually use optipng. Any insight which is better?

There's a good comparison between multiple png optimizers here: http://optipng.sourceforge.net/pngtech/optipng.html > pngcrush by Glenn Randers-Pehrson, available at http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush , is an open-source program that iterates over PNG filters and zlib (Deflate) parameters, compresses the image repeatedly using each parameter configuration, and chooses the configuration that yields the smallest compr…

In the end it does not matter since they did not use any of them. If I can reduce size of that page in 2 minutes, without any webdev background and using the only tool I could remember if few seconds than there is something seriously wrong with the way they treat visitors.

Re: IBM Type

#36
post #33

It's a licensed font from Blue Monday. No cyrillic, no greek, not to mention polytonic greek. And they took the true small caps out of the fonts ... MISC FIXED forever!

[deleted]

Re: IBM Type

#37
post #21

Great page, it only took 13s to load. With no wonder when it takes 13.8 MB. And the biggest png files are not even pngcrushed... du -ch editorial-1.png editorial-3.png product-1.png product- 2.png product-3.png product-4.png 2,5M editorial-1.png 832K editorial-3.png 368K product-1.png 288K product-2.png 284K product-3.png 1,2M product-4.png 5,4M total vs pngcrushed: du -ch editorial-1.smaller.png editorial-3.smaller.…

I just heard of pngcrush for the first time. I usually use optipng. Any insight which is better?

I realise this doesn't answer your question, but there's a nice macOS GUI with multiple crushers built-in:

https://imageoptim.com/

Re: IBM Type

#38
post #35
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a good comparison between multiple png optimizers here: http://optipng.sourceforge.net/pngtech/optipng.html > pngcrush by Glenn Randers-Pehrson, available at http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush , is an open-source program that iterates over PNG filters and zlib (Deflate) parameters, compresses the image repeatedly using each parameter configuration, and chooses the configuration that yields the smallest compr…

In the end it does not matter since they did not use any of them. If I can reduce size of that page in 2 minutes, without any webdev background and using the only tool I could remember if few seconds than there is something seriously wrong with the way they treat visitors.

maybe they aren't familiar with this tool. perhaps you could email them and suggest it to them, and then they would improve their site.

Re: IBM Type

#40
post #3

While interesting, is this really necessary? Call me skeptical, but value add = negligible, justification for an entire department to spend several months+ working = likely. I can see why companies like Apple and Microsoft would want to be involved in making fonts, they make their bread and butter by creating warm-fuzzies and having a consistent design language; IBM though, less so? Genuinely interested to hear other…

IBM is a large company (380K headcount) with a design staff. They produce A LOT of textual material for clients that are paying serious piles of money.

Typography is a fickle, subtle thing that can influence people without them being aware of it. While on HN, folks may pretend to prefer stark naked HTML, that doesn't fly with the general public.

IBM decided it needed a refresh in that area. Good for them and good for the graphic design professionals that did the rather impressive work here.

Post reply on HN