Pure UI
11–20 of 25 posts
Re: Pure UI
#12How was the view counter made? It's cool to see it increase in realtime.
Re: Pure UI
#13Re: Pure UI
#14I'm not sure but this sounds like the writer has unknowingly stumbled upon react.
Unknowingly? He mentions React by name. This was written in 2015, when React was far less popular. Guillermo clearly decided to bet big on React after this- his company Zeit produces next.js, one of the nicer React frameworks out there. (Can somebody add [2015] to the title?)
Re: Pure UI
#15Re: Pure UI
#16I'm still waiting for a component economy that could keep up with e.g. Delphi's VCL. Right now, it's either big UI frameworks or stuff you've got a hard time integrating (e.g. they download half the internet, require 28 properties to connect/style). Pure rendering model (i.e. independence from data) alone doesn't cut it.
Re: Pure UI
#17How was the view counter made? It's cool to see it increase in realtime.
Re: Pure UI
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unknowingly? He mentions React by name. This was written in 2015, when React was far less popular. Guillermo clearly decided to bet big on React after this- his company Zeit produces next.js, one of the nicer React frameworks out there. (Can somebody add [2015] to the title?)
Also, the author is advocating a UI model that has pre-existed React, it was just popularised by React. You could argue that Elm is actually closer to what the author is advocating.
Re: Pure UI
#19How was the view counter made? It's cool to see it increase in realtime.