Live data from Hacker News

Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

investor.snap.com

21–30 of 204 posts

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#21
> Hosting costs per DAU were $0.68 in Q3 2017 as compared to $0.64 in Q3 2016 and $0.61 in Q2 2017.

Those are staggering figures to me and the trend is equally surprising. Maybe it's ignorance about hosting costs at such a scale, but i feel like cost/DAU should be declining over time, right? Is there something i'm missing here?

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#22
post #8
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The kids still snapchat so... me thinks a while.

What kids? Kids with credit cards or kids where most purchases are made by parents and therefore hard to link back to ads shown on SnapChat? I'm in my 30's and don't know too many people that use SnapChat... so when people say "young kids use SnapChat" I'm not sure if that means 13-18 year olds or 18-29 year olds or something.

Average revenue per user (ARPU) – ARPU was $1.17 in Q3 2017, an increase of 39% over Q3 2016 when ARPU was $0.84. ARPU increased 12% over Q2 2017 when ARPU was $1.05.

It's brands with credit cards and "kids" with eyeballs. It's a promotions/advertising play.

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#23
post #9
post #7

SNAP down 16% in after hours trading (at 4:54pm eastern time): https://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASNAP&ei=bSsCWpmn...

For those wondering, click on the chart and type 'e' to show after hours trading.

Very cool. I've used google finance for years and never knew that. I always assumed all you got wrt after hours stuff was the little "After hours" quote underneath the day's closing price.

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#24

> Hosting costs per DAU were $0.68 in Q3 2017 as compared to $0.64 in Q3 2016 and $0.61 in Q2 2017. Those are staggering figures to me and the trend is equally surprising. Maybe it's ignorance about hosting costs at such a scale, but i feel like cost/DAU should be declining over time, right? Is there something i'm missing here?

Is this a monthly cost or yearly?

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#26

> Hosting costs per DAU were $0.68 in Q3 2017 as compared to $0.64 in Q3 2016 and $0.61 in Q2 2017. Those are staggering figures to me and the trend is equally surprising. Maybe it's ignorance about hosting costs at such a scale, but i feel like cost/DAU should be declining over time, right? Is there something i'm missing here?

[deleted]

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#27

> Hosting costs per DAU were $0.68 in Q3 2017 as compared to $0.64 in Q3 2016 and $0.61 in Q2 2017. Those are staggering figures to me and the trend is equally surprising. Maybe it's ignorance about hosting costs at such a scale, but i feel like cost/DAU should be declining over time, right? Is there something i'm missing here?

Maybe the amount of usage per user is increasing (a metric that isn't really reflected by just counting DAU)?

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#28

> Hosting costs per DAU were $0.68 in Q3 2017 as compared to $0.64 in Q3 2016 and $0.61 in Q2 2017. Those are staggering figures to me and the trend is equally surprising. Maybe it's ignorance about hosting costs at such a scale, but i feel like cost/DAU should be declining over time, right? Is there something i'm missing here?

They have to receive the picture, then send it to a number of other users. So it's probably mostly bandwidth charges.

They use Google, right? When was the last time Google (or any of the cloud providers) lowered their bandwidth charges?

That small fluctuation is probably just minor variations in usage.

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#29
post #25

How long do you think they have left? OR Do you foresee them surviving beyond 2027?

I'm usually quite bullish on Snap. They seem to be doing some things right. From the outside, they seem overstaffed so it's good to see them reducing headcount. The fact that they're rebuilding the android app completely sounds like a bad idea that will be a bit of a timesink.

Re: Snap Inc. Third Quarter 2017 Results

#30
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sort-of, but it's a once-off: Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes $2.5 billion of stock-based compensation expense, primarily due to the recognition of expense related to RSUs with a performance condition satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our initial public offering.

Still leaves ~600mm in losses. Which is still greater than the ~350mm in losses last year. The idea that money given to employees as equity is not "real money" is toxic.

Why? Don't most companies separate out their stock based compensation expenses?
Post reply on HN