Live data from Hacker News

The End of Gratipay

gratipay.news

1–10 of 82 posts

Re: The End of Gratipay

#2
Patreon has cornered the market on funding projects which otherwise have not much revenue potential. I’ve been seeing more and more open source projects switching to that model. (The only bad thing about Patreon is no option for one-time contributions)

Re: The End of Gratipay

#3
I met Chad when I lived in Pittsburgh and we had great times regularly hacking on Gratipay in a coffee shop. Chad would teach regulars how to code by making them do small pull requests on the project. Even when Patreon swooped up the market he had a profound sense of why the project still mattered -- Gratipay was open source, took no fees, and was funded entirely on its own platform. Chad you are a badass, cheers man!

Re: The End of Gratipay

#5
Startups are ridiculously hard. The biggest mistake young founders and companies make is going heads down in code for 3, 6, 12 months without marketing and sales. I've been there and failed.

What is the market? Is it a good one? Open source while incredible, is damn difficult to build a proper business.

I'll reiterate my stance that the best products with the best technology often times don't win. That doesn't mean that you should not strive for perfection in products, it just means there is more to the game than that.

Re: The End of Gratipay

#6
Wow they were really committed to resolving their issues in public. It's pretty interesting to go through their github issues.

It's amusing to contrast the difficulty of tipping another internet user before cryptocurrency and after. Due to regulatory cost it's still rough for a company to act as a conduit using cryptocurrencies, but accept a tip from another internet user is as easy as (BTC): 18bsU4fM14AbiQ6aXSRc7XSnduT75cCigX

Re: The End of Gratipay

#7
Having helped out very little with this project - it makes me sad to see it go. Chad is a great guy and means well in all that he does.

I wish him the best :)

Re: The End of Gratipay

#8
At the end of the "gittip crisis" it seems that they capitulated to the demands of a group of users who felt unsafe sharing information about how much money they made. Users who had mostly already left. I think this was a big mistake, as the "leader-board" features provided important social-proof that gratipay worked. That you could make money from it. Tracking how much money projects gave to other projects was good UX, it meant you could feel good about giving money to a large meta-project, because you knew it was passing that money down to smaller projects it depended on.

After they made the decision to remove leaderboards I mostly lost interest.

Re: The End of Gratipay

#9
Liberapay seems pretty good, a lot like older gittip in UX. Leaderboards and all. I'd be interested in hearing more about it, why it split from gittip, etc. I may use it instead of patreon, but there's not a lot of information about, well, how it was founded.

I suspect I will be switching my matrix donation from patreon to liberapay. It would have been nice to know that was an option.

Re: The End of Gratipay

#10
Thanks for the send-off, everyone. Feels right somehow to hit the HN homepage one more time before putting Gratipay to bed. So many lessons learned, already scheming about Next Time™.

See you down the line! :D

Post reply on HN