This assumes people are working just because they aren't on a smoke break. If you work on a production line in a factory, it's fairly easy to see the output level of your work. If you work in an office, there is not a simple measure. The non-smoking worker could just as easily spend the same time chatting it up around the water cooler. Physical presence does not equal working time. I wish more managers understood tha…
Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
21–30 of 130 posts
Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I think it says that people feel they're working harder than smokers. So far as I can tell, there was no attempt to say they actually do work harder. The other half of this is that it incentivizes smokers to quit. This is about motivating non-smokers who are feeling de-motivated. And about helping people drop an unhealthy habit.
> Company based on 29th floor of Tokyo office block Similarly, I help people dropping the unhealthy habit of Tokyo high rise office blocks by not working there. Why mess about with symptoms when you can have the root cause?
Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#23Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#24Given the amount of walking needed to get outside the building and the sedentary nature of their job, it's worth considering whether, on balance, the smokers at this company are actually healthier and more productive than they would be if they kicked the habit.
Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#25Good. I used to work a blue-collar, industrial job, and was really tempted to buy a cheap pack of cigs, as a dummy so I could tag along and take a non-smoking break with the smokers. By the time they hoofed from wherever they were working to the designated smoking area, burned one down, and walked back, 20-30 minutes of every hour could get chewed up.
Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#26Does the company have a culture of encouraging people to actually take those holidays? Based on my experience in Japan, nobody actually uses their holiday time, to avoid losing face at work. The only holidays people actually take are the public holidays. Luckily, they have a good number of them, including a whole week at the beginning of May.
Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#27The smoking is bad of course, but the specific focus on it, to me, feels pretty hinky.
How about taking breaks every once in a while because you work hard, and you’re a human, not a robot? That should be ok without the passive-aggressive framing.
I dunno. Just seems a bit “off” to me.
Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#28Good. I used to work a blue-collar, industrial job, and was really tempted to buy a cheap pack of cigs, as a dummy so I could tag along and take a non-smoking break with the smokers. By the time they hoofed from wherever they were working to the designated smoking area, burned one down, and walked back, 20-30 minutes of every hour could get chewed up.
Why not just go for a non-smoking break without any pretence?
Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#29This assumes people are working just because they aren't on a smoke break. If you work on a production line in a factory, it's fairly easy to see the output level of your work. If you work in an office, there is not a simple measure. The non-smoking worker could just as easily spend the same time chatting it up around the water cooler. Physical presence does not equal working time. I wish more managers understood tha…
Re: Company gives non-smokers six days holiday to compensate for cigarette breaks
#30Given the amount of walking needed to get outside the building and the sedentary nature of their job, it's worth considering whether, on balance, the smokers at this company are actually healthier and more productive than they would be if they kicked the habit.
Definitely not. Relatively minor health benefits from standing vs. drastic health consequences from smoking.