11–20 of 107 posts
Why not name the coin in the title? Bancor.
In this case the more general title is superior. I, for example, had never heard of bancor so wouldn't have clicked on the article.
Then it's informative to readers who know what Bancor is and those who don't.
Edit: I'm probably getting downvoted because I'm comparing IPOs to ICOs. They are significantly different and everyone should beware of scams.
I'm sure Bancor couldn't care less about their token price collapsing. They've already got all of the "investors'" money. In fact, they could just walk away right now instead of carrying on developing the system. The brave new world of ICOs offers no protection against companies failing to follow through on their ICO roadmap. Maybe Bancor could use the token collapse as an excuse to quit now?
Platforms for creating platforms, coins for creating coins.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The entire concept is a multi level marketing scheme.
And this reductive reasoning can be applied to the stock market or for that matter any cryptocurrency - that doesn't make it right.
Why do so many cryptocurrency projects seem so meta? Platforms for creating platforms, coins for creating coins.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The entire concept is a multi level marketing scheme.
No, not all of it. It only appears that way before looking into it more.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The entire concept is a multi level marketing scheme.
No, not all of it. It only appears that way before looking into it more.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, not all of it. It only appears that way before looking into it more.
Would love to hear more on legitimate use cases for blockchain (not being sarcastic) that cannot already be solved by centralized database, merkle trees and/or public key encryption.