Live data from Hacker News

Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

kapwing.com

141–150 of 190 posts

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#141

I found it really difficult to take this article seriously. >Kapwing is an online video and GIF meme generator It adds bars of text to the top and/or bottom of a gif. This product is worth $0. Probably less.

"Around 8% of users who could have used the apology flow converted into paying customers"

One man's trash...

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hijacks my back button..big no no

Can someone explain to me why hijacking of the back button is even possible? It's obviously something that browsers could fix, and the fact they don't fix it means that there must be some legitimate uses. But what legit use?

In this case I think it doesn't hijack your back button. The first page redirects to a second page, and they both end up in your history. If they used history.replaceState() then you'd only have one entry in your back-stack. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/History_API

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#143
post #131
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If it was that easy, it would have been done. Part 2: business model problems! - getting money into the system is plagued by usual fraud problems of card TX for pure digital goods - nobody wants to build a federated system; everyone wants to build a Play/Apple/Steam store where they take 30% - winner-take-all effects are strong - Play store et al already exist, why not use that? - Free substitute goods are just a c…

"Play store et al already exist, why not use that?" Play store does not have the content I want. And it seems overly difficult to post the content I want to make. And if I want to pay for engagement with the content, that's not an option. Patreon is lot closer to what suits my needs. But even that is too inflexible on how to use payments and to what you should pay. So far everybody seems to be making their micro-tran…

I never thought of Zizek as the vanguard of the micropayments revolution ...

I agree about the "funding more content" angle; I hope twitter eventually realises this, but they really have a bad idea about how their own platform works and seem to be allergic to taking money from users for features.

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#144
post #55
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Online, asking for $1 is asking for someone's credit card info.

Right, and Mirimir has no credit cards :( I used to argue for Bitcoin, but at $6K that's crazy. However, a EZPass-like token funded with cards, cryptocurrencies, money in the mail, etc. That would be cool.

What's the transaction fee on a Bitcoin transaction these days? Minimum $1.50? With a 15- or 30-minute delay on confirmations?

Not for micro- nor instant-transactions.

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#145
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Amusingly, Amazon charges me $0.14 every single month for my usage of Amazon S3. I wonder if they've got some sort of sick deal where they don't pay per-tx. Off-topic but I had this (except I have a non-US card, so the foreign transaction fee was larger than the S3 bill). I contacted Amazon and asked if I could prepay $50 and they added a small balance to my account for free that'll cover my tiny S3 usage for the ne…

Aren't foreign exchange fees calculated by %?

Some credit card companies charge $3 or $5 for transactions made in other currencies, with exchange rate being separate.

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#146
Imagine the same implemented in mainstream news media, links to which is always on top here on HN. "I'm too poor to pay non-cancellable monthly subscription to The CNN Times and extremely want to read this exciting article '10 Reasons Why Zuckertrump Is A Horseman Of Apocalypse'".

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only that, but by now I've figured out that the comment sections of most sites are toxic with little, if any, moderation. HN has a good moderation set-up, respectful members, etc. I try to avoid even reading the comments of other websites since they just end up being depressing.

BBC is especially depressing.

You should try Fox News.

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#148
post #64

As usual, greed slows down progress.

Greed? It's a startup posting on Hacker News about how they're trying to build a business, which is right in the bullseye of the Hacker News schtick as far as I can tell. Since when has it been greedy to try and make a living, even doing something random and frivolous? The world needs random and frivolous things. Regardless, I thought it was an interesting experiment.

Wrong article. I was posting in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15591020 but misplaced the comment.

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#149
post #128

You should force non-paying customers to refer a friend or to share the page with a SEO optimized title on their facebook/twitter profile. But you shouldn't remove the skip payment option until you have a big user base.

Adding a sharing feature to get past the payment is an interesting thought. Instead of subjecting your users to ads you make them advertise to others on your behalf. Its definitely a good move for them if they are a young company.

Re: Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology

#150
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> real progress Let's not pretend that consumer-facing cryptocurrency-backed anything is little more than something for speculators, libertarians, and nerds.

Don't bother, the HN crowd will downvote this hard, bitter truth. I had this conversation N times, my argument is roughly this: "There's no legit use of bitcoin. Main usages are a) pyramid-like hold-and-hype b) illegal money transfers out of China. No, ordinary people don't want to use it for international transfer because you need to go through hops to get Bitcoin on the sender end, even worse the receiver needs to…

The community here is much more reasonable than, say, reddit. Notice the comment hasn't been killed as you expected it would. People here understand pretty well the barrier between cryptocurrency and "regular people."
Post reply on HN