Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
1–10 of 79 posts
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#2Are there any good websites to gauge battery development progress as opposed to the vital, but often ephemeral research progress.
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#3Green Car Congress provides good context. This is also a potential manufacturing revolution.
But it's a hard problem because of the massive swelling of silicon during the lithiation, I think during discharge.
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#4There is a recurrent pite patter of amazing new battery technologies, but of course the question is it can it be mass produced. Are there any good websites to gauge battery development progress as opposed to the vital, but often ephemeral research progress.
Cost, Reliability, Capacity
You could list cost of materials, number of cycles with 80 percent capacity left, capacity in Wh/kg.
But it would still be incomplete. Maybe some "driving cycle" style standardized tests for various uses. Also manufacturing scenarios.
Hard to create something non gameable.
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#5http://www.greencarcongress.com/2017/10/20171031-ecn.html Green Car Congress provides good context. This is also a potential manufacturing revolution. But it's a hard problem because of the massive swelling of silicon during the lithiation, I think during discharge.
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#6http://www.greencarcongress.com/2017/10/20171031-ecn.html Green Car Congress provides good context. This is also a potential manufacturing revolution. But it's a hard problem because of the massive swelling of silicon during the lithiation, I think during discharge.
Oh, Solution. Phones with stretchy backs and a balloon battery.
As regards the article, Lithium-Silicon batteries have the potential to add much more than 50% to the charge density of Lithium-ion batteries. More like 400% in theory. But nobody has demonstrated a cheap, production-ready process for such a thing, because a charged silicon anode occupies much more space than a discharged one, and the associated mechanical stress is a severe problem. There has been an endless parade of press releases from universities and national laboratories over the past 10 years on this topic.
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#7There is a recurrent pite patter of amazing new battery technologies, but of course the question is it can it be mass produced. Are there any good websites to gauge battery development progress as opposed to the vital, but often ephemeral research progress.
"These discoveries usually concern materials that can only be produced in a laboratory environment on a very small scale. What makes our invention so promising is that the technology for mass production of this material is already within reach due to its similarity to an existing production process for solar cells."
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#8There is a recurrent pite patter of amazing new battery technologies, but of course the question is it can it be mass produced. Are there any good websites to gauge battery development progress as opposed to the vital, but often ephemeral research progress.
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#9There is a recurrent pite patter of amazing new battery technologies, but of course the question is it can it be mass produced. Are there any good websites to gauge battery development progress as opposed to the vital, but often ephemeral research progress.
> Are there any good websites to gauge battery development progress as opposed to the vital, but often ephemeral research progress.
Not that I know of, sorry.
Re: Batteries with 50 per cent more energy with pure silicon anode
#10This though- this is very cool. If they've actually demonstrated 100 cycles in a pouch cell, made with reel-to-reel, that may mean that commercial cells are Commercial cells have 500-800 cycles in their lifetime (until their capacity falls to 80%) and are universally made on reel-to-reel machines. If it can't be done on reel-to-real it can't be done cheaply. There are a ton of difficulties moving from a coin cell to a prismatic/pouch cell to a cylindrical cell, but I can't understate how encouraging it is that they got to 100/400 cycles. It's near unheard-of with fully silicon anodes.
This is also quite promising for future development. When they say 1000-2000 mAh/g they're referring to the anode itself- only the weight of silicon, not the full battery. Silicon tops out near 4000 mAh/g, so there's a reasonable headroom there. 50% increase in overall capacity for the entire battery is fairly conservative. I presume it's because they can only apply very thin layers of anode silicon. That may mean there's a lot of room for growth though! They just have to thicken up that layer.
I'm still very skeptical of their long term capacity though. The problem with anodes like this is the nanoscale features. You basically have a huge tangle of velcro: that's done to increase the surface area exposed to the electrolyte, which solves the anode expansion problem. The drawback is that when that surface area becomes restricted, and it inevitably does, the SEI affects the distribution of li ions inside the silicon, increasing damage. They do appear to have found a way around that, but it may still put a long term limit on capacity. The thicker you try to make the anode (to increase energy density), the deeper the "velcro" becomes, and the more the SEI blocks lithium. It may also make these batteries more sensitive to heat and overcurrent and over/undervoltage- anything that disturbs the SEI may cause dramatic irreversible effects.
Random related fun fact: Silicon requires the use of copper rather than aluminum foils in batteries. Aluminum is a semiconductor dopant (the exact one used in your computer, in fact), and if you deposit silicon onto an aluminum foil it will form a very weak diode that causes a ton of problems. In computers an extremely thin silicon oxide film is used between aluminum wires and the transistors they connect. That layer is extremely resistive and causes a bunch of headaches, but way smaller ones than tiny diodes would!