Earlier quoted context omitted.
How exactly will you use this PII to perpetuate voter fraud? Show up at a polling station with fake ID or PII? Then at another polling station with another piece of fake ID or PII? What's your plan for voting staff checking the records, and finding out that 'you' already cast a ballot at that station? This kind of fraud is incredibly risky, and does not scale (And is trivial to combat). Election fraud by the process…
Let's take as a starting point this list of methods: http://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/heritage-explains... (I realize that's from the Heritage Foundation - I'm not particularly conservative - it's just the first decent list I came across while Googling.) Let's take these 3: """ False registrations: Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a phony name and a real or fake address or claim r…
Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
41–50 of 154 posts
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How would you detect this kind of fraud? Voter rolls are public. You can't see how someone voted, but you can see if they voted.
Sure, but there's no reliable way to determine of someone is a real and qualified voter in the precinct they voted. That's the whole problem. Nobody is engaged in a conspiracy to vote hundreds of times, but are a lot of people voting in various technically illegal ways? Sure.
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#43This is a crime. The power to unregister voters must be forcibly taken away from states; especially red states, since they are the only ones abusing this power. It should require federal action, instead.
This is an action which legitimately needs to be done. I think the larger issue we need to fix is the partisan entrenchment that lets people justify this being done to further their own agendas. Using targeted disenfranchisement to further your own political goals is quite clearly illegal, we just need to start sending people to jail over it instead of excusing it because the ends justify the means.
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How would you detect this kind of fraud? Voter rolls are public. You can't see how someone voted, but you can see if they voted.
Sure, but there's no reliable way to determine of someone is a real and qualified voter in the precinct they voted. That's the whole problem. Nobody is engaged in a conspiracy to vote hundreds of times, but are a lot of people voting in various technically illegal ways? Sure.
Have you registered to vote in the United States? Records are corroborated.
Remember, voter rolls are public. My New York City record lists my name, address, party affiliation and voter district information. Anyone can challenge this based on public information, e.g. social media posts, court records, employment records, et cetera, or absolutely nothing.
In New York, you literally write a letter and the Board of Elections opens an investigation. Lots of people do this every year, and the problem isn't them finding anything useful. The problem is them (a) burning tax dollars and (b) knocking off the rolls those who forgot to report minor address changes, e.g. moving within the same building.
> a lot of people voting in various technically illegal ways
Many have looked for evidence of this. Zero has been found. It's a high-cost, low pay-off gamble. Will some people be idiots? Sure--there's a small handful every election. Is this even remotely of concern? Absolutely not.
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#45This is a crime. The power to unregister voters must be forcibly taken away from states; especially red states, since they are the only ones abusing this power. It should require federal action, instead.
> It should require federal action Shooting from the hip is a good way to trash a democracy. What you're proposing would allow a single, centralized actor to purge voters from the rolls. De-centralised systems will always have longer, more-idiotic tails. That's the tradeoff for their robust central tendencies.
Someone has to stop Kris Kobach, basically.
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#46Anyone with half a brain knows that these purges are designed to advantage a side not protect the system. I read an article the other day that stated that some America's voting system had essentially been compromised on many levels. It made me think about why so many of our polls have, in the last few years, been so off the mark. Now I'm beginning to think it's not because the polling models suddenly don't work. It i…
http://www.wnyc.org/story/city-board-elections-admits-it-bro...
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's complete nonsense. The Supreme Court and several district courts have found states like North Carolina to be actively using purges and registration changes for the purpose of disenfranchising voters. Furthermore, if you want to protect the integrity of the vote, registration is the last logical place to start, as in person fraud is vanishingly rare. Only 2 people were charged with doing so in this past electio…
It doesn't get charged often because there are parties that fight tooth and nail to prevent the implementation of processes that would allow the detection of ineligible voters voting. It is shown in every election cycle that there are cases of voters voting who should not be because of their citizenship or felon status or voting in multiple districts. When you say that only 2 have been charged, why is that relevant?…
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's complete nonsense. The Supreme Court and several district courts have found states like North Carolina to be actively using purges and registration changes for the purpose of disenfranchising voters. Furthermore, if you want to protect the integrity of the vote, registration is the last logical place to start, as in person fraud is vanishingly rare. Only 2 people were charged with doing so in this past electio…
It doesn't get charged often because there are parties that fight tooth and nail to prevent the implementation of processes that would allow the detection of ineligible voters voting. It is shown in every election cycle that there are cases of voters voting who should not be because of their citizenship or felon status or voting in multiple districts. When you say that only 2 have been charged, why is that relevant?…
Source? Because every [1] source [2] I find [3] says the opposite.
[1] http://library.uwp.ac.id/digilib/files/disk1/13/--publicadmi...
[2] http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=...
[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#49Anyone with half a brain knows that these purges are designed to advantage a side not protect the system. I read an article the other day that stated that some America's voting system had essentially been compromised on many levels. It made me think about why so many of our polls have, in the last few years, been so off the mark. Now I'm beginning to think it's not because the polling models suddenly don't work. It i…
I agree. The media seems to mainly focus on voter purging and whatnot when it tends to favor the GOP, and not looking much at the other side. But it's happening with Democrats, too. The elites must know about how vulnerable these systems really are, and they're using it to their advantage. http://www.wnyc.org/story/city-board-elections-admits-it-bro...
Re: Indiana Purging Voters Using Software That’s 99% Inaccurate
#50De rigueur pointer to a discussion of the birthday paradox for those who don't understand why the combination of first name, last name, and birth date is an unavoidably flawed way of uniquely identifying individuals: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bring-science-hom... .